New Weight-Loss Drugs Could Well Be America’s Next Health Care Disaster

by on August 10, 2012 · 4 comments

in Business, Government, Health

San Diego Company’s Belviq Drug Ok’d After ‘Concerned Citizen’ Petitions FDA to Override Advisory Committee Concerns

By now, most people are aware of the obesity statistics. Thirty-four percent of US adults are obese, 34 percent are overweight and more than a third of children are either obese or overweight. The average American man weighs 194 and the average woman, 165. (This trend brings to mind an old New Yorker cartoon in which a doctor tells an overweight patient, “According to this chart you should be seven feet and two inches tall.”)

Not everyone agrees on the reasons for the ballooning American physique. Is it inactivity? Overeating? The wrong foods? Environmental factors? The Centers for Disease Control report that excess weight is linked to coronary heart disease, stroke, Type 2 diabetes, cancer, high blood pressure, liver and gallbladder disease and osteoarthritis. One statistical report says obesity is actually more harmful than smoking, drinking or poverty. And that’s assuming the overweight aren’t afflicted with those conditions, too.

But despite the 200 million Americans who might use a diet pill and the $60 billion a year such a pill represents to Pharma (more than the statin market, $25 billion a year and erectile drug market, $5 billion a year combined!) the FDA has not approved a new diet drug in 13 years. Worse, the last diet drug it approved, Orlistat, found in the prescription drug Xenical and over-the-counter version Alli, has been a disappointment and the “butt” of jokes.

Orlistat causes weight loss by blocking the body’s absorption of fat, putting users at risk of “fatty/oily stool, oily evacuation, increased defecation and fecal incontinence, ” says its prescribing information. Soon after the drug’s approval, comedians let fly one-liners like, “With Allies like this, who needs enemas?” and “Free coupon for Depends.” Scat and splat jokes aside, weight loss is also only modest with the fat blockers and in 2010 the FDA added warnings of “severe liver injury.”

So it is no surprise that some overweight people, the doctors who treat them, Wall Street and Pharma are heartened by the FDA’s approval this summer of two new diet drugs. Qsymia, made by Mountain View, CA-based Vivus and Belviq, made by San Diego-based Arena Pharmaceuticals were both turned down by the FDA in 2010 but reconsidered and approved this year when more safety data were presented. Both are expected to hit pharmacy shelves before the end of the year.

Qsymia combines the diet pill phentermine (also known as Fastin, Adipex and Ionamin) with topiramate, the active ingredient in the seizure drug Topamax known to suppress appetite. Even though both ingredients are already on the market and could be prescribed without Qsymia’s approval, the FDA rejected the combo pill two years ago over concerns about depression, memory-loss and birth defects risks. (Months after Qsymia’s 2010 rejection, the FDA added a birth-defect warning to topiramate.)

Belviq is lorcaserin, a never-before-approved antidepressant-like drug similar to two drugs withdrawn from the market for deadly heart valve problems in 1997. The FDA rejected Belviq in 2010 because of tumors in rats given the drug, causing Arena to lay off 66 employees and prompting a petition to the FDA charging that, “The dramatic elevation of concern over rat cancer,” could “result in irreparable damage to the bio-technology and pharmaceutical industry as a whole.”

Of course, dangerous diet drugs have also caused “irreparable damage to the bio-technology and pharmaceutical industry,” which is why the FDA has been so gun-shy about approving a new diet med. Fen-Phen, which combined phentermine (found in the just-approved drug Qsymia) and dexfenfluramine or fenfluramine (similar to the just-approved Belviq) was withdrawn as a combination drug in 1997 for causing primary pulmonary hypertension (PPT) and heart valve deaths. The drug’s lethal side effects were especially embarrassing to the FDA since its own reviewer had predicted them if the two drugs were combined but his veto was overridden and the drug was approved anyway. Oops.

The same year Fen-Phen was withdrawn, the FDA approved the diet drug sibutramine (Meridia) which was also withdrawn from the market in 2010 for cardiovascular problems! In fact, the appetite reducing action of diet drugs and heart problems can be so closely linked an FDA advisory committee voted earlier this year to require all obesity drugs to undergo more stringent clinical trials to assess cardiovascular risks.

Now, the FDA is taking no chances with the newly approved drugs. “Qsymia can increase heart rate; this drug’s effect on heart rate in patients at high risk for heart attack or stroke is not known. Therefore, the use of Qsymia in patients with recent (within the last six months) or unstable heart disease or stroke is not recommended. Regular monitoring of heart rate is recommended for all patients taking Qsymia, especially when starting Qsymia or increasing the dose,” said the FDA in approving the new diet pill. Similar warnings appear for Belviq.

Both drugs are strictly approved for adults with “initial body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2″ and other obesity-related risks factors–not for people who are a size 4 and want to be a size 2. They are also approved as “adjuncts to reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity for chronic weight management,” meaning that patients have to do some of the heavy lifting too. And patients are cautioned to not stay on the drugs if they aren’t working and to have close doctor supervision even when they are.

To keep “pill mills” from sprouting up with the new drugs as they did in the 1990s to cash in on the popularity of Fen-Phen before it was withdrawn, the FDA has also tightened the new drugs’ availability. Doctors must prescribe Qsymia through a certified pharmacy and cannot stock it themselves reports NBC News and Belviq will likely be controlled by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) like opiate painkillers.

How well will the new drugs actually work? In clinical trials, Qsymia users lost up to 10 percent of their total body weight. Besides the appetite suppressing phentermine, Qsymia contains topiramate which users actually complain makes them lose too much weight because it makes food and beverages taste bad. Of course the 10-percent weight loss comes at the price of a risk of birth defects, a warning that is clearly marked.

In clinical trials, Belviq users lost up to 5 percent of their total body weight, considerably less than with Qsymia. But some are predicting doctors or patients may add phentermine to Belviq and create a neo Fen-Phen since Belviq’s ingredient is similar to the withdrawn ingredient Fen-Phen. Few liked the drowsiness, memory loss and mood changes caused by the withdrawn “fen” drug but when phentermine (now in Qsymia) was added, it counteracted the effects and maximized the weight loss. Anticipating the desire on the part of patients or doctors to reconstitute a Fen-Phen, Belviq’s prescribing information warns against “coadministration” of other weight-loss drugs and even mentions phentermine by name. Certainly the warning covers topiramate (the other ingredient in Qsymia)–as well as taking all three active ingredients together.

It is not clear whether insurance will cover Qsymia and Belviq, which are projected to cost $100 to $200 a month (or more). Despite the well-documented expenses of treating obesity-related health problems, Medicare doesn’t cover diet drugs, reports the industry site FiercePharma. Few state Medicaid programs cover diet drugs either and private insurers often ask patients to share the cost.

Like alcoholics who can never drink normally again, many obese people will not return to “normal” eating even if their weight becomes normal through the use of diet pills, say eating behavior specialists. They need to change their whole relationship to food. Even those who learn “normal eating” are up against the so-called “thrifty gene” that confounds the body by keeping it at a plump “set point” regardless of how low calorie intake goes. Waiting for blockbuster diet drugs pills to solve such life-long struggles is unrealistic, most say.

In fact, testimony about Qsymia in 2010, when it was first considered, confirmed the problem. Erin Aycock, an obesity patient who spoke during the open-microphone portion of FDA hearings, told the advisory committee that Qsymia was “like instant willpower,” and that she “had the ability for the first time in my life to say ‘I don’t even care if I eat that cookie.'” But that was the good news. Aycock also added that 90 percent of the weight she had lost on Qsymia quickly returned when she quit the drug.

Martha Rosenberg is an investigative health reporter. Her first book, Born With a Junk Food Deficiency: How Flaks, Quacks and Hacks Pimp The Public Health, has just been released by Prometheus Books. This article was originally posted at AlterNet.
avatar Robert Conover August 10, 2012 at 10:59 am

The data on weight loss with Belviq are not correct. You say that Belviq users lost up to 5% of their weight, yet the published papers show that 22 % of patients lost 10%. Some people respond and some don’t, so reporting a single figure is a misrepresentation.

You also failed to mention the role of belviq in type 2 diabetics who have a very difficult time losing any weight at all. A paper published in the journal Obesity showed that Belviq can help these people loss weight and substantially improve their glycemic control, as shown by a 0.9% improvement in hemoglobin A1c. This is equivalent to many of the drugs already on the market for diabetes.

This is not a magic pill and will not help everyone, but your article unjustifyable presents Belviq in a poor light. Maybe your negative article will discourage some from getting the help they need. Notice the FDA did not require a Rems for Belviq, just the other drug.

avatar Doug Porter August 10, 2012 at 12:27 pm

Belviq works by activating brain receptors that control serotonin levels; these control feelings of being full and satisfied. Similar drugs are used for treating depression. All these types drugs have a fairly high rate of not working in patients. What is of more concern is the lack of scientific understanding behind why (as opposed to how) these drugs work and/or don’t. Behind that “why” question are even more questions about brain chemistry that remain unanswered.
Any decision to use these sorts of medications must be tempered with the drug industry’s spotty (remember fen-phen? or Obitral?) record in bringing products into the marketplace. It’s also important to understand that the FDA does NO testing of drugs; the studies that we read about were sponsored by drug companies who have a very well-documented history of suppressing results that are unfavorable.

avatar Robert Conover August 10, 2012 at 2:18 pm

Yes, Arena Pharm remembers fen-phen very well. In fact, they specifically designed Belviq to replace phen without binding to the other serotonin receptors in the heart. It is a triumph of drug design and development that there was no increased valulopathy in 8000 treated patients.

Agree big pharma companies are not angels (what company is?), but the increased life expectancy that we have seen over the last 50 years is largely the result of new medicines such as blood pressure meds. Simply dismissing their collective research as tainted is inappropriate and unscientific. Of course, we have to look for scientific bias, but their papers in the NEJM and Obesity are well done.

avatar Sharon August 10, 2012 at 3:20 pm

Keep in mind that Qsymia does not have to go through the drug scheduling delay because the drug is already considered a controlled substance. It does not have to go through the process because this drug is nothing more than drugs currently on the market.

As far as future combinations are concerned clinical testing will be done before the labeling would change.

Belviq also have a huge benefit for obesity that Qsymia does not have. Belviq actually lowers A1C in diabetics. For the pre-diabetic patient population they will be using this drug because it has much lower side effects then diabetes medications on the market today.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Older Article:

Newer Article: