Riding the Rails in the West – the State of Amtrak – Part 2

by on January 10, 2013 · 5 comments

in Business, Culture, Economy, Editor's Picks, Government, Travel

Amtrak 2 JEC OAKLANDNITE One Zephyr too soon –

Editor: Part 1 originally ran November 29th; Part 2 was delayed due to the author’s foot surgery and he sends his apologies.

By JEC / Special to San Diego Free Press

News item, December 26th, China debuts the longest bullet train in the world. From Beijing to Guangzhou a distance of 1,428 miles, the ‘new’ train will serve 35 cities and cover the distance in under 10 hours, averaging speeds of 186 mph. The old train, the shame of Wuhan took almost 24 hours to cover the 1,428 miles. Hold the phone – the bad old train served the same 35 cities covering the 1,428 miles in less than 24 hours at an average speed of 60 mph. If we only had it so good.

Amtrak jec helpon 016

Above – pulling into Oakland at night after leaving San Diego at 6a.m.
Here: “all aboard!” (All photos by JEC.)

Amtrak’s Premier West Coast train, the Coast Starlight is very similar; 1,377 miles from LA to Seattle with 30 stops in between. But it takes the Starlight over 34 hours, making an average speed of only 40.1 mph. If the Coast Starlight could match the old average speed of China’s Beijing to Guangzhou train of 60 mph, the trip would take less than 23 hours.

In Part I of Riding the Rails in the West, I mentioned the reason for taking Amtrak to Chicago was to learn about the condition of inter-city travel across California and across the west. Starting in San Diego a few minutes after 6 in the morning we enjoyed a few Amtrak mishaps along with wonderful (and not so wonderful) views on our way through Los Angeles and up the coast. Part I left with our train sitting a mile short of our destination in Emeryville a few minutes shy of 1 am. Our train again delayed as another reconditioned classic private car is attached for transport north. With only about one-third of the trip to Seattle completed, this train is already three hours behind schedule. Staring out into the misty darkness I began to wonder about the wisdom of pre-paying for our hotel room that now sits empty and cold.

Amtrak 2 Jec SactoThe trip to the Bay Area on the Coast Starlight was more than a comedy of errors. It is an opera of inefficiency. Self-inflicted wounds started when Amtrak took the time to transport a private rail car, no doubt for the money. This leads to conflicts with the freight trains who own the tracks and take priority, and because of single track, like a single lane bridge allows only one direction at a time forcing Amtrak to slow down or get off onto sidings adding to the delays. Also playing in this opera, the condition of the track that limits speeds to 75 mph along with poor maintenance that forces many unscheduled stops. Together this opera of inefficiency prevents Amtrak from keeping a schedule or obtaining a decent average speed, making inter-city train travel impractical if not impossible. Imagine taking a three hour train trip and arriving seven hours late. Helpless comes to mind.

The Coast Starlight finally leaves the rail yard, rolls along at 20 mph for a few minutes until we arrive at Emeryville, our destination. Its 1:05 am; 3 hours and 8 minutes late. By the time we find a taxi, wake up the hotel clerk and fall into bed it’s almost 2 am. The California Zephyr leaves in just over seven hours. Using Amtrak is tough. You’ve got to want it. It’s good to be flexible as well. In the end, the 597 mile train ride from San Diego to Oakland, with a 2 ½ hour layover took 19 hours. Excusing the layover in Los Angeles, Amtrak enjoyed an average speed of 36 mph.

Amtrak jec fillrup 015

Fill ‘er up.

That last half hour on the Starlight, staring out into the darkness of the east bay rail yard I had to wonder why; why is California charging ahead to create high speed rail before we have mid-speed rail. Like a child who successfully rode a bike with training wheels wanting to jump behind the wheel of a Corvette, getting inter-city trains to travel faster than a car would be an accomplishment. California has yet to earn a 200 mph train. I went to bed apprehensive of what two days on the California Zephyr would be like.

The morning was crisp and clear although I needed to sleep another hour, or two. Just before 9 am we join 40 other passengers on the platform at the Emeryville Amtrak Station to prepare to board the California Zephyr. The Zephyr is assembled in the Oakland rail yard a half mile south of Emeryville; eight passenger cars – three sleeper cars, three coach cars, with a lounge car and a dining car in between. The 40 of us are divided between coach and sleeper car passengers. Coach passengers are not allowed in the sleeping cars. My wife and I have two roomettes in the Number 2 sleeper car; it’s the next to the last car on the train. Unlike the Coast Starlight, this morning the California Zephyr leaves on time – to the minute.

Amtrak riders might be familiar with this route between Oakland and Sacramento. It’s the same track used by the Capitol Corridor one of Amtrak’s busiest routes. Fifteen daily commuter trains make the Sacramento to Oakland run in each direction during the weekdays. Traveling along the east bay, through Richmond and Martinez, crossing the Carquinez Strait over the George Miller Memorial Bridge, along Suisun Bay and across the checker board fields of the delta until the city of Davis and finally crossing the Sacramento River to arrive at the Amtrak station in downtown Sacramento. Again, unlike the Starlight, the Zephyr is on time to the minute at every station.

The station in Sacramento is under construction. A hub of new track is converging in the downtown area. A much larger station is needed. From the looks of things, Sacramento sees more trains in California’s future.

Amtrak 2 jec DonnerL

Donner Lake.

Dozens of coach passengers board in Sacramento. The run to Reno is popular. The 150 mile trip takes you over the Sierras at Donner Pass and some of the most historic track in America. The slow climb through the mountains is a nice way to spend five hours. Heading east the best views are from the port side of the train. Overall the lounge car provides the best views, but at times the lounge can be crowded.

We’ll be sleeping two nights on the Zephyr to Chicago. There’s a few things the movies leave out about sleeping on trains. First it’s about the noise. On-coming freight s hit hard; a loud boom rattles the entire train. You hear it, you feel it, like getting slapped upside the head. If you can, get a roomette on the side away from the freight trains. But in fact, that’s not really possible because you’re never sure. Second it’s about the rough track. Every intersection, culvert, bridge, and sometimes out in the middle of nowhere the sound of steel on steel echoes through the sleeper cars along with the motion that sometimes resembles a fast drive down a dirt road, a product of tracks built to haul freight not people.

And, for a thrill, there are a few bumps you remember. It was about 2 am in the middle of Nebraska, the train hit one memorable bump in the track; like a bomb going off, there was a loud bang as the train lurched to one side. Waking with a start your first thought is derailment. Will the train stop leaning? Will it straighten up? It takes a minute to get the adrenaline under control. In March, 2001 the California Zephyr derailed in Iowa. The entire train with 196 passengers left the BNSF tracks and rolled down an embankment. One died, dozens were hurt. Comforting thoughts as you try to go back to sleep.

The California Zephyr to Chicago takes 51 hours; two full days and nights. Sleep deprivation can be expected. But at least you can stay clean. Showers for sleeper car passengers are provided. Showering on a train is not unlike taking a shower in a 30 foot RV traveling down the interstate. To keep from being bounced off the walls like a racket ball, wedge yourself in the corner of two walls. Avoid leaning on the door because it will fly open and you might end up on the floor. Not that I did mind you. I actually found showering on a train fun, in an existential sort of way.

Amtrak jec GrandJ 09

Grand Junction, Colorado.

The Zephyr is rather slow, averaging only 47.5 mph over the 2,438 mile trip to Chicago. The slow speed makes sleeper cars and showers necessary. (Imagine riding in nothing but a coach seat for 51 hours. No bed, no shower.) The Zephyr climbs up and over the Sierras and the Rockies. The scenery is beautiful but the mountains offer a challenge for a train which could excuse the Zephyr’s slow speed although the route includes crossing a thousand miles of open prairie.

Even the flat farm land of Iowa and Illinois Amtrak schedules an average speed of only 52 mph. According to the GPS, at no time did the Zephyr travel faster than 76 mph; mostly traveling between 60 and 65 mph. A 25% improvement in speed, from 47.5 mph to 60 mph would cut 11 hours off the trip. But, as the Swedish tourist observed back on the Starlight, inter-city Amtrak is not for really getting any place; it’s for the tourists and the Zephyr offers views of a huge chunk of America, for the tourists.

The Zephyr has one of the worst on-time records of any of Amtrak’s long distance trains, making the schedule only 52% of the time. But on this trip the Zephyr made every station within 15 minutes of the schedule and arrived in Chicago 15 minutes early. A perfect trip, as it were. Interesting, but exhausting. We looked forward to a decent meal, say at McDonald’s and a bed that didn’t move.

Amtrak jec cows 08

A couple of midwest cows that somehow got on the train’s side of the fence.

Life on a long distance train is a chance to meet a diverse group of people. Students, families, TSA refugees, tourists and retirees frequent Amtrak. Europeans often take Amtrak, in part because they are familiar with trains and in part to see the desert. No desert in Europe. You’ll also likely to meet people who love trains. As group they know a great deal about the status of Amtrak. And, as a group, they love to talk trains. Jeff was one among a number of people I got to know on the trip to Chicago. Jeff is a recently retired airlines executive who prefers traveling by train and was a helpful source of information about Amtrak. Jeff loves trains; believes in trains, and believes the California High Speed Rail project is a ‘swindle’ (his word). The expense is consuming all the resources (funding) and the limited scope (LA to SF) and great expense ($65 Billion) will turn people against trains.

The California High Speed Rail (CHSR) project is controversial. The CHSR Authority, unable to secure funds beyond this first phase is stubbornly pushing forward on the Fresno to Merced segment because of rules regarding $3.3 Billion in Federal funding. According to the rules, construction on the project must begin by September, 2013 or the CHSR project risks losing the funding. Critics insist this Fresno to Merced segment will become an island; a high speed rail to nowhere as a Washington Post opinion piece put it.

Amtrak jec ColorWindm 018

A wind farm in the plains.

The money to finish the CHSR project from Anaheim to San Francisco, another $50 + Billion, has not been identified. In December, the GAO testified to Congress that U.S. taxpayers could be called on to provide $42 Billion in additional yet to be secured funding. Given the Federal budget issues, the CHSR Authority has reportedly explored the idea of using revenues from California’s cap and trade emissions program as another funding source even though cap and trade revenues remain undetermined.

On the other hand, why would we in San Diego care. It appears San Diego has no horse in this race. Then again how should we feel about being left out of the largest public works project in the history of the State of California? We need to care because, as Jeff pointed out, the CHSR project is sucking up all the transportation funding in California. The Fresno to Merced segment uses $8.2 Billion of Proposition 1A bond monies.

Amtrak 2 JEC GeoMillerBridge

The George Miller Bridge outside Chicago.

San Diego, though helping to pay for state bonds, will not be served by the project even if completed. The CHSR exclusion of San Diego could explain why SANDAG’s 2050 Plan did not include rail. The SANDAG 2050 Plan expects more and larger freeways; modest expansion of the trolley, but no other rail development. SANDAG’s plan is now being challenged.

So now what? I am a supporter of trains. Like Jeff, I believe trains can be an important part of our future. I voted for Proposition 1A and endorsed efforts to build a high speed rail system. But it’s clear; the vision is, in a way, one Zephyr to soon. The CHSR Authority website displays images of bullet trains in Europe and Japan as models for the Authority. Those bullet trains were built on an established network of regional trains that people grew to trust and rely on. California has no such system.

California cannot afford $65 Billion for a train that travels between LA and San Francisco in 2 and ½ hours. If California proceeds as planned, the $10 Billion in Proposition 1A bond money will produce little value leaving a 40 year debt service to be paid while our transportation situation worsens. We can do better.

Why new right-of-ways? The CHSR Project includes new right-of-ways. About $4 Billion of the $11.5 Billion budgeted for the Fresno to Merced segment is slated for right-of-way acquisition. The Fresno Bee estimates as many as 500 pieces of property will be subject to eminent domain just for this first segment. If applied to the total project, these new right-of-ways would cost approximately $23 Billion. Responding to right-of-way issues, last month the Authority announced a change in plans and now intends to use existing right-of-ways in the final approaches into Los Angeles and San Francisco. Still, this is little more than re-arranging the deck chairs. And will those final approaches continued to be owned by the freight companies?

California is crisscrossed with rail right-of –ways. California’s cities and towns grew up as the railroad grew. Those existing tracks tie together cities and businesses, there are stations and infrastructure. Roads, bridges, culverts and canals; water, power, freeways and parking lots, all already exist along the existing track. These associated assets are worth too much to just walk away. While a 200 mph train is impressive, what California could really use is a decent 100 mph train. Lay down new seamless track, straighten the track in spots, double track and fence the length of the network and eminent domain the freight companies such as Union Pacific and BNSF.

New straighter track will permit faster speeds. Double track will reduce delays and traffic conflicts. Fencing will keep people safe and the system a bit more secure. And taking control of the best right-of-ways will provide freight companies with better track, able to travel at faster speeds with fewer delays while taking advantage of existing infrastructure. We need California Rail before we can add high speed. Write Governor Brown. California and San Diego needs a better idea.

avatar Frank Gormlie January 10, 2013 at 3:51 pm

This should be mandatory reading for all those mass transit policy-wonks. Thanks Jon for making this entire issue much more real and personal.

avatar John Lawrence January 10, 2013 at 4:06 pm

As a railfan and as one who has traveled extensively by train in Europe, the state of our rail passenger system is deplorable compared to theirs. Even the tiniest village has rail connections to larger hubs. I traveled on everything from a Toonerville Trolley to the fast intercity trains. I didn’t travel on the highest speed trains like the TGV because they are a lot more expensive, and I had a railpass which limited me. I would have had to pay extra. Even the former eastern Europe countries like Poland and the Czech Republic have excellent rail systems and the trains are usually on time. The food in the dining cars is excellent too. All in all a first class experience. And you don’t need a car to get almost anywhere in Europe.

avatar Anna Daniels January 10, 2013 at 6:45 pm

Yesterday afternoon we drove my cousin back to Mission Viejo. We left Del Mar around 4pm and headed north on 5. Our small cramped car was wedged into a concrete river of traffic moving north at 70mph most of the time, 25 mph some of the time. The car pool lane was virtually empty. The hour and a half trip stunk of car fumes, and was typified with impatient drivers and my mounting claustrophobia.
In retrospect, I wish I had seen my cousin off at an Amtrak station and saved us all the soul sucking deadening freeway trip at rush hour and our own return trip to San Diego.
Like you JEC, I long for the reliable, frequent “ordinary” train service. Hannah Arendt marveled that the U.S. was so amazing at doing the impossible ( putting men on the moon) and so mystifyingly inept at doing the possible.

avatar R. van Wormer January 11, 2013 at 8:32 am

I don’t think the idea of building high speed tracks between Fresno and Merced is a bad idea. This is exactly what the French did when they began to build their TGV system. The entry to cities remains over the older track system while the new tracks were built out in the rural areas. Conventional trains can also use the new tracks over part of their route greatly speeding up their journeys.

It is true that European rail systems do have far better right of ways even for the more ordinary trains. They were originally built to much higher standards than most American lines, partly for military reasons. That is they were almost completly grade separated, no road and street crossings, double tracked, and fenced in. Also in most European countries trespassing on the railways is “streng forbudt”, Strictly forbidden and not tolerated. In addition and fortunately the car culture came to Europe much later than it did to the US. The family car did not begin to be widespread among the populations until the 1970s giving the rail systems more time to adjust. In the US car ownership was very widespread by the 1920s causing a rapid decline in the use of passenger trains over shorter distances.

To get some idea of travel on French railways it is easy to just go to You tube and type in “SNCF passenger train or TGV or Corrail ( the more ordinary but still fast intercity trains that run at 100 to 120 mph speeds) The latter trains correspond to what JEC may have in mind as ordinary fast reliable trains.

Despite the complaints about high costs of building rail people seldom blink at the costs and hidden costs of highway building. That’s something else to think about.

avatar bob dorn January 11, 2013 at 9:59 am

Even if existing rail service is disrupted, we shouldn’t assume a new bullet train will be as inadequate. The proposed train’s route is through the Central Valley on new track, right?And if San Diegans would have to take the Coaster to Orange County to catch the proposed bullet in Anaheim not much time would be expended doing it.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Older Article:

Newer Article: