• Home
  • Subscribe!
  • About Us / FAQ
  • Staff
  • Columns
  • Awards
  • Terms of Use
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Contact
  • OB Rag
  • Donate

San Diego Free Press

Grassroots News & Progressive Views

No, Mayor Hall, What We See is Not What We’ll Get

January 11, 2016 by Richard Riehl

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp

Carlsbad Braces for Measure A, the Special Election Vote on Lagoon Mall

carlsbad protest screenshotBy Richard Riehl / The Riehl World

As the February 23 special election approaches, Carlsbad voters may want to recall words spoken by Mayor Matt Hall and Councilmember Mark Packard at the November 17 meeting of the City Council.

After signatures were ratified on a successful citizens-led referendum, the Council could either rescind its decision to allow a billionaire LA developer to build a shopping mall on the shores of the city’s pristine Agua Hedionda Lagoon, put the issue up to voters in a special election, or put it on the ballot of the General Election.

The Council decided to spend $600 thousand on a special election. As on August 25, the vote was unanimous. The regular absence of split votes by this group on contentious issues suggests either unusually unified thinking or a careless observance of the Brown Act. If it’s the former, a disregard of constituent diversity of opinion is a matter for voters to think about in the next election. If it’s the latter, it’s time for someone on the inside to be a whistleblower.

After Assistant City Manager Gary Barberio explained the City Council’s options for action that night, Mayor Hall asked the speakers lined up for public comment to, “Be specific, towards the dates for the election.” Ignoring Hall’s attempt to silence discussion of rescinding the Council’s August 25 vote, the first two speakers spoke against the approved plan. In response, the mayor called a halt to public comments until Barberio could “correct the errors” he claimed were made by the first two.

I don’t know whether interruptions to allow for rebuttals of speaker opinions is unprecedented, but the general practice has been to allow all to have their say before inviting comments from council members and staff. Neither of the first two speakers were allowed to defend their arguments. To their credit, none of the others who followed obeyed the mayor’s plea to ignore the elephant in the room.

After public comments, Hall asked Barberio and the city attorney to respond to the assertion the developer could make changes to his plan without city approval. The two explained the city planner would have to approve proposed changes to assure they were in keeping with the plan approved by the council. Mayor Hall chimed in, “So what you see is what you are going to get.”

That’s a promise the mayor can’t keep, and here’s why. Modifications to the plan are allowed, according to the city’s website.

“Some actions that typically require Planning Commission or City Council approval would be acted upon at the “administrative” level, meaning the city’s professional staff would evaluate applications against the standards in the specific plan and make a determination about compliance. The decisions reached by the city’s professional staff could not be appealed to the Planning Commission or City Council.” 

The plan itself is more specific.

“The City Planner’s sign-off, or refusal to sign-off shall be final, however, the Specific Plan applicant or designee and City Manager shall meet and confer over any such refusal to sign off. There shall be no administrative appeal of the City Planner’s sign-off or refusal to sign-off.” (6.13.2.2)

If the city planner’s decision is final, why would the developer and City Manager have to confer over a refused sign-off, unless it’s an offer the city planner can’t refuse?

Don Neu is Carlsbad’s City Planner, a very hard man to find on the city’s website. He reports to the Director of Community and Economic development, who reports to the Asst. City Manager for Operations, who reports to the City Manager, who reports to the City Council. So the one person responsible for approving changes to the developer’s plan for a lagoon shopping mall is three levels removed from those we’ve elected to act in our best interests. The potential for corruption is breathtaking.

To add credibility to the city’s analysis of the developer’s plan, Councilmember Packard asked Council staff at the November 17 meeting, “Can you tell me how many man hours were put into analyzing the project for the 9212 Report?” Does he really believe time spent on something reveals quality? No matter how long it took to produce, or the gender of those working on it, the report’s rosy findings disclose a report carefully crafted to promote the developer’s project.

No, Mayor Hall, what we see is not what we’ll get. All we’ve seen so far are pretty pictures and a promise by a billionaire developer who’s already lied to us once.

More next time about the 9212 Report and the battle of the consultants over the promised economic/financial benefits to the city.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
Richard Riehl

Richard Riehl

After his 30-year career in public education, Richard Riehl began his second life as a freelance journalist, beginning as an op-ed columnist for San Diego’s former daily newspaper, North County Times. During the 2008 Presidential campaign he edited the Huffington Post’s daily, Roadkill: OffTheBus’s Ongoing RoundUp of the Awkward, the Ugly, and the Just Plain Weird. His articles have appeared in the San Diego Reader’s BlogDiego, Carlsbadistan-Taming The Wilds of Carlsbad-by-The-Sea, and the OsideNews.com. Richard received a Society of Professional Journalists, San Diego Chapter 2016 Journalism award. Check out his blog at The Riehl World, email him at richard_riehl@yahoo.com, and follow him on Twitter, @RichardRiehl.
Richard Riehl

Latest posts by Richard Riehl (see all)

  • Carlsbad’s Bogus State of the City Video - August 16, 2017
  • Will District Elections Loosen the Grip of Carlsbad’s Old Guard? - August 7, 2017
  • Carlsbad Mayor Matt Hall’s Profile in Cronyism: Formalizing Appointments to City Committees - June 14, 2017

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Filed Under: Activism, Environment, Politics Tagged With: Carlsbad

« Supreme Court Case Impacts Teachers, Public Employees
American Media in 2016: Those Afflicting the Comfortable Need Not Apply »

Comments

  1. bob dorn says

    January 11, 2016 at 9:39 am

    Lots of people are pulling for the majority of Carlsbad who
    don’t appear in the sophisticated and costly ads in favor
    of Carlsbads’ malling. That majority doesn’t appear in the
    ads because they don’t work for the developer, and won’t
    profit from his invasion of the town. Good luck. These
    columns on the mallefaction of Agua Hedionda Lagoon are
    going to make historian’s jobs easier.

  2. Brian McInerny says

    January 11, 2016 at 3:55 pm

    Thank you Richard. People who know the facts are appalled at the Mayors behavior When the Mayor asks to be fact checked it is time to worry. Apparently he has others do his thinking for him. Such as the City attorney. No disrespect but it sure would be nice if the facts were published in a paper that the right leaning public would happen to read. The Los Angeles Times would be a start. I do not think the Union wants to know the real facts. The lack of good honest media is a shame.

  3. Guardian says

    January 12, 2016 at 7:59 pm

    Thanks. Glad there is a Voivce for the people of Carlsbad out there. A big no on measure A, Febuary, 23rd.

  4. Tanya Brooking says

    January 15, 2016 at 10:05 pm

    Thank you for this honest reporting. Please keep digging. Perhaps you’ll find a whistle blower before it’s too late. We are running out of time.

  5. Dee Forsberg says

    January 16, 2016 at 7:27 am

    Richard, Thank you for continuing to state the facts!

San Diego Free Press Has Suspended Publication as of Dec. 14, 2018

Let it be known that Frank Gormlie, Patty Jones, Doug Porter, Annie Lane, Brent Beltrán, Anna Daniels, and Rich Kacmar did something necessary and beautiful together for 6 1/2 years. Together, we advanced the cause of journalism by advancing the cause of justice. It has been a helluva ride. "Sometimes a great notion..." (Click here for more details)

#ResistanceSD logo; NASA photo from space of US at night

Click for the #ResistanceSD archives

Make a Non-Tax-Deductible Donation

donate-button

A Twitter List by SDFreePressorg

KNSJ 89.1 FM
Community independent radio of the people, by the people, for the people

"Play" buttonClick here to listen to KNSJ live online

At the OB Rag: OB Rag

An Open Letter to the San Diego City Council’s Land Use and Housing Committee

Human Banner at Ocean Beach in San Francisco: ‘It Was Murder. ICE Out!’

Bonus Density Programs Reinforce Historic Segregationist Patterns

Update on San Diego’s Four City Council Races

San Diego Community Coalition Bulletin: This Week at City Hall

  • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Terms of Use

©2010-2017 SanDiegoFreePress.org

Code is Poetry

%d