Those illegally foreclosed on get a pittance in return.

By John Lawrence

Banks foreclosed on military service members, homeowners who had been approved for a loan modification and even homeowners who were current on their payments. At least 53 homeowners who weren’t behind on their payments were successfully foreclosed on and lost their homes for no reason.

There was widespread criminal behavior on the part of the banks, but in a recent settlement they got off relatively cheap.

A foreclosure settlement between the government and 13 banks on April 9 spread $3.6 billion in cash among millions of borrowers. The consultants who determined how much each homeowner would get happened to be bank employees and will get $2 billion for their efforts.

The cash will be split among 4.2 million borrowers who were in foreclosure in 2009 or 2010 and had home loans serviced by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Aurora, Citibank, HSBC, MetLife Bank, PNC, Sovereign, U.S. Bank, and SunTrust.

Close to 1.2 million borrowers, or about 30 percent of the total whose properties were foreclosed on, had to battle potentially wrongful efforts to seize their homes despite not having defaulted on their loans, being protected under a host of federal laws, or having been in good standing under bank-approved plans to either restructure their mortgages or temporarily delay required payments.

Other abuses such as robosigning affected numbers of homeowners. Bank employees were paid to sign thousands of foreclosure documents despite no qualifications for the job in lieu of the banks getting the proper documents from their respective counties which would have cost them money and time. Despite all the criminal and fraudulent activities the banks engaged in related to foreclosures, they have not been prosecuted and have gotten off relatively scot-free. Millions of homeowners, however, have not been so fortunate. They have lost their homes to foreclosure despite having done nothing wrong.

The amount of money set aside to compensate those wrongfully foreclosed on is a mere pittance.

A total of 234,000 of the borrowers had worked out a new payment plan with the banks, but were foreclosed on anyway. This is known as dual tracking where one bank department was trying to foreclose on the home while another department worked out a loan modification. Evidently, the right hand didn’t know what the left hand was doing but that would be giving the banks’ criminal operations too much credit. Both hands knew what the other one was doing, and they did it in such a way so as to stick it to homeowners and make themselves the most profits.

After getting the homeowners to keep on paying something on their mortgages, they went ahead and foreclosed on them anyway. That maximized their profits and drew a cheer from Wall Street. After all, they do have to report their earnings to Wall Street, and Wall Street frowns when they don’t meet their projections. When profits are maximized, however, it makes investors and shareholders happy — and their charters make it clear that is their job above all else.

The government agency which carried out the so-called Independent Foreclosure Review, whose purpose was to compensate the wrongfully foreclosed upon, is called the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). It is an agency that has been completely captured by the bank lobby and considers as its purpose the protection of the banks and not the homeowners. As a result homeowners who had lost their houses to the banks received a mere pittance in return for the experience.

The OCC determined that the banks themselves should hire consultants whose job it was to determine how much each homeowner was to be paid after giving each case an independent review. They were paid $250 per hour for their services. This came out of the total amount which was set beforehand to be divided up among the homeowners.

The nearly 1.1 million victims of dual tracking actually received $500 each.

Five hundred dollars for being criminally defrauded out of their homes. Five hundred dollars for being double-crossed, for being led down the garden path thinking they had worked out a payment plan. This was a criminal operation fully participated in by a government agency, the OCC. Another 865,000 were in the process of foreclosure even though they had worked out a loan modification when they were foreclosed on.

Here’s What You Can Buy for Having Your Home Stolen: about one hour with an attorney, a couple cases of booze, about ten pitchforks, 4 months rent in Alaska, 2 months rent in a storage facility, 300 boxes of Kleenex or an Apple iPhone.

A homeowner not in default got $125,000. They did nothing wrong. They were current on their payments yet the banks took their homes anyway — illegally I might add. Wrongfully foreclosing on active duty members of the armed forces is a criminal felony, but the banks merely have to pay $5000. For that, these lucky bastards could get a 2 meter dome tent.

Nobody has been indicted for these criminal felonies involving active duty service members, but that’s nothing new. The banks have been getting away with murder ever since the financial crisis hit in 2008 and Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson, former Goldman Sachs CEO, ran around Washington with his hair on fire.

Each of the wrongfully foreclosed on homeowners was supposed to get an individual review of their case, but instead the Federal Reserve and the OCC engineered a mass settlement. They, in essence, engineered a crime wave and determined that the banks should not have to pay for their misdeeds.

On Chris Hayes’ show, All In on MSNBC, Eliot Spitzer, former New York state Attorney General said:  “The amount of money that was involved in the totality of the settlement … is less than the Treasury Department gave to Goldman Sachs to cover their exposure to AIG, which was $12 billion. Nobody said anything. Goldman just got a check for $12 billion. All the massive and wrongful foreclosures in the country only got two thirds of that. The amount of money is insanely low.”

He went on to say that the OCC is the paradigm of a “broken fraudulent regulatory body. It has been in the back pocket of the banks historically.” Pre-crash in 2003, Eliot Spitzer and the other AGs went to court concerning the subprime scandal. The OCC came in on the side of the banks to stop them. “We had to litigate all the way to the Supreme Court because the OCC was covering for the banks.” The OCC opposed mortgage writedowns. The OCC said, ‘No, we’re here to protect the banks not the entirety of the economy.’ ”

So this whole operation of redressing the grievances of foreclosed upon homeowners was essentially a sham designed by OCC to wipe away the banks’ liabilities in the cheapest possible way. The banks saved billions of dollars in getting this deal.

Alexis Goldstein, who also appeared with Spitzer on MSNBC, accused the OCC of outright lying by saying that the banks’ dirty, double-crossing dealings only affected a small number of homeowners. She said, “They were lying when they said there was a 4.2% error rate.” In actuality the error rate on the part of the banks was much larger.

Spitzer said: “There was an absolutely grotesque failure to do an appropriate review. The OCC should be eliminated.”

The totality of the settlement going to the victims is $3.6 billion while the amount going to the independent auditors who were actually bank employees is $2 billion.

If you were paid $500 as your settlement, and a consultant was paid $250 per hour to review your file and then they walked away with $10,000 while you got $500, how would you feel? The widespread practices of deceit, malfeasance and incompetence on the pert of the banks resulted in 4 million homeowners getting $3.6 billion while consultants walked away with $2 billion.

Subsequent to the announcement by the OCC, the banking subcommittee of the US Congress of which Elizabeth Warren is a member, grilled deputy counsel of the OCC, Daniel Stipano.  It seems that the OCC has determined that all the proceedings involving the Independent Foreclosure Review will be kept secret. Even the US Congress will not have the right to know what went on in the determination of “awards” given to the aggrieved homeowners. Some open democracy this is!

The OCC will keep secret any and all information that the consultants considered. Why did the OCC let the banks hire consultants who were bank employees, and whose job it was to examine the banks and determine the amounts of money given to the wrongfully foreclosed? Apparently, Congress and the American people don’t have a right to know.

The banks have become to big to fail, too big to prosecute, even too big to exact a meaningful penalty.

The premise is that doing any of these things would hurt the entire economy, but, according to David Stockman, Reagan’s Budget Director, this is not true. He argues eloquently in a new book, The Great Deformation, that to bring down the big banks would not have hurt the Main Street banks or the Real Economy at all. The ATMs would not have shut down. Businesses would receive banking services as normal.

Yet, taxpayers gave $700 billion to the big banks as part of the TARP program and the Federal Reserve ginned up $7 trillion, which it dispersed not only to American banks but to banks all over the world. This was just to save the financial casino economy and had nothing to do with the economy that most Americans participate in. The Fed is still at it with Quantitative Easing, printing $85 billion a month and giving it to the big banks to gamble with.

But if you’re an average American kicked out of your home, even though you had been paying your mortgage or thought you had worked out a payment plan with the bank, you might just end up with $500.

• Bio
• Latest Posts

John Lawrence

John Lawrence graduated from Georgia Tech, Stanford and University of California at San Diego. While at UCSD, he was one of the original writer/workers on the San Diego Free Press in the late 1960s. He founded the San Diego Jazz Society in 1984 which had grants from the San Diego Commission for Arts and Culture and presented both local and nationally known jazz artists. John received a Society of Professional Journalists, San Diego chapter, 2014 award. His website is Social Choice and Beyond which exemplifies his interest in Economic Democracy. His book is East West Synthesis. He also blogs at Will Blog For Food. He can be reached at j.c.lawrence@cox.net.

Latest posts by John Lawrence (see all)

• Economist Kenneth Arrow, Nobel Laureate, Dead at 95 - March 22, 2017
• Container Ships Burn Dirtiest Fuel: the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Could Change That - March 15, 2017
• Cities and States Prefer Public Banks To Wall Street - March 7, 2017