By Rick Moore Escondido Democratic Club
San Diego County’s new General Plan is “light years more progressive” than its predecessor, said County Planning Commissioner Michael Beck in remarks before the September 14 meeting of Escondido Democrats. The good news is that there are far more restraints on semi-rural and rural development than before. The bad news is that aggressive developers have chosen the political route to work around those restraints, and the Board of Supervisors is being asked to grant exceptions for dozens of projects.
Beck said 47 such exceptions, known as “amendments,” have been grouped together and are being brought before the board. First, however, he said taxpayers will have to pay for a lengthy review process “that will take us through the next election.”
That makes the politics of election to the Board of Supervisors important, Beck indicated. “You’re fighting money and politics, just to be real about it,” he said. “I would also observe that no land use battle has ever been fought without a lot of people engaging. Victory doesn’t happen on its own. You may have 5,000 people and still lose, but you will not win if you have just two people.”
He also encouraged activists to focus on “politics at the regional level… getting the right people elected… look, land use decisions boil down to three votes, ultimately.”
On a positive note, Beck explained that legal challenges would be easier to resolve under the new plan. “The integrity of the plan is much cleaner and clearer than it has ever been before,” he said, so legal challenges based on the standards in the plan will be easier for judges to decide.
Beck noted, however, that one of the proposed developments generating the most controversy, Lilac Hills near Valley Center, is not in the group of amendments. The developer, Accretive, has chosen to pursue an amendment on its own, separating from any broader decision.
Audience member Kevin Barnard, president of the Escondido Creek Conservancy, mentioned another way residents can affect development – literally buying the land and taking it off the table. Barnard said local dollars are used to “prepare land for acquisition” and then state, federal or private funds are used for the purchase. So he recommended that anyone concerned about rampant development get involved in their local conservancy organization and “pay attention to the candidates who make land use decisions.”
Beck agreed, estimating that projects stopped during recent years have prevented from 10,000 to 20,000 “rooftops” from being built. He estimated that some $300 million has been spent to acquire land, and that between $30 and $40 million was being spent for this purpose each year in San Diego County. Beck is involved in the County’s Multiple Species Conservation Program, a regional effort to preserve habitat for wildlife and to protect watersheds and water quality.
Photo Credits Escondido Creek Conservancy
Source
Latest posts by Source (see all)
- And Then They Came for the Vietnamese… - December 13, 2018
- Amazon’s Disturbing Plan to Add Face Surveillance to Your Front Door - December 13, 2018
- 140+ Arrested as Youth-Led Protests Demand Green New Deal on Capitol Hill - December 11, 2018
Keep these coming at us, Rick Moore, and Escondido Democrats; this piece was quick and articulate on a subject that normally defies effective writing.
The larger point that it helps to make, of course, is that people have been abandoning the far-flung “new communities” because commute times and gasoline consumption have become impossible to sustain. But the industrialized corporate development monster believes that downturns in the economy are only temporary and that it can buy land cheap and wait for the market to catch up. This may no longer be true; we seem to have been eliminating the middle class, which bought all those remote, two-story castles.
Local government might do better to repair existing roads and sewers serving existing neighborhoods, rather than crumbling under the weight of the corporate builders.
An ominous thing in the article is that bundling together of all the requests for exceptions to the general plan it describes. It’s a tough thing to do for a commissioner, standing up to such an onslaught.
Great piece Rick, thanks for writing it.