• Home
  • Subscribe!
  • About Us / FAQ
  • Staff
  • Columns
  • Awards
  • Terms of Use
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Contact
  • OB Rag
  • Donate

San Diego Free Press

Grassroots News & Progressive Views

How Cities Can Be Designed to Help—or Hinder—Sharing

May 7, 2014 by Source

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp

City-dwellers are more likely than others to share housing, transit, and knowledge. Creating a new urban economy depends on valuing this interaction over individual consumption.

Photo: Jon Sullivan Creative Commons

Photo: Jon Sullivan
Creative Commons

By Jay Walljasper/Yes!

Centuries before someone first uttered the words “sharing economy,” the steady rise of cities embodied both the principles and promise of that phrase. The reason more than half the people on earth now live in urban areas is the advantages that come from sharing resources, infrastructure, and lives with other people. Essential commons belonging to all of us, ranging from transportation systems to public health safeguards to plentiful social connections, are easier to create and maintain in a populated area.

Think about typical urban dwellers. They are more likely to reside in an apartment building, shared household, or compact living unit (saving on heating, utilities, original construction costs, and other expenses), walk or take transit (saving the environment as well as money), know a wide range of people (expanding their circle of friends and colleagues), and encounter new experiences (increasing their knowledge and skills).

Access to these opportunities for sharing offers economic, social, environmental, and
educational rewards. But living in a populated area does not automatically mean more sharing.

Indeed, the classic suburban lifestyle—a big, single-family house and a big yard isolated from everything else and reachable only by automobile—makes sharing extremely difficult.

Minimizing opportunities for sharing was a major consequence of America’s post-World War II suburbs, says Tom Fisher, Dean of the University of Minnesota College of Design.

“Scholars have gone into the archives of major companies during that period, and found the same concern expressed over and over by business leaders: “How do we as a society keep operating at the level of consumption we did during the World War II?”

That fear reached far beyond big business. Much of the public also worried that we would plunge back into a depression as soon as the massive industrial production of the war halted.

The solution was converting factories that fueled the war effort into large-scale producers of consumer goods.

“The suburbs were designed as a landscape to maximize consumption,” Fisher explains. “It worked against sharing of any kind. People had all this stuff in their houses and garages, which was going unused most of the time.”

Autos replaced streetcars. Kids rode school buses instead of walking to school. Everyone bought their own lawn mower, shovels, tools, sports equipment, and grills. Even the proverbial cup of sugar borrowed from a neighbor disappeared in favor of the 10-pound bag bought at the supermarket.

As our spending grew, our need for social connections shrank. “Mass consumption was good for the economy, but bad for our well-being,” Fisher notes. He now sees changes ahead for our communities as the economy evolves.

“The new economy is all about innovation, which depends on maximizing interaction, not consumption.”

This means redesigning our communities to bring people together by giving everyone more opportunities to “walk, live close together, and share.”

This shift can already be seen in farmers markets, co-working spaces, tool libraries, bike sharing systems, co-ops, credit unions, public spaces, and other sharing projects everywhere.

“Creative people in cities around the world are rising up…” declares Neal Gorenflo, co-founder of Shareable magazine. “We are not protesting, and we are not asking for permission, and we are not waiting—we are building a people-powered economy right under everyone’s noses.”

Excited by this emerging grassroots movement, Shareable recently launched the Sharing Cities Network to be an independent resource “for sharing innovators to discover together how to create as many sharing cities around the world as fast as possible.”

The aim is to help empower and connect local initiatives around the world through online forums, peer learning, and other ways to boost collaboration, share best practices, and catalyze new projects.

“How we build is just as important as what we build,” Gorenflo says in a fund-raising appeal for the network. “We build for maximum fun. We do it in style. And we include everyone.”

This article is excerpted from the ebook, Sharing Revolution: The Essential Economics of the Commons, a project of On the Commons. Jay Walljasper writes, speaks, and consults about creating healthy, lively communities. His website: JayWalljasper.com.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
Source

Source

Source

Latest posts by Source (see all)

  • And Then They Came for the Vietnamese… - December 13, 2018
  • Amazon’s Disturbing Plan to Add Face Surveillance to Your Front Door - December 13, 2018
  • 140+ Arrested as Youth-Led Protests Demand Green New Deal on Capitol Hill - December 11, 2018

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Filed Under: Culture, Economy, Environment, Government, Politics

« The Works Progress Administration (WPA):”This Day in Labor History: May 6, 1935″
San Diego Airport Is First in World to Be Certified LEED Platinum »

Comments

  1. John Lawrence says

    May 7, 2014 at 9:49 am

    Consumer cooperatives and worker cooperatives are the wave of the future. Reducing individual consumption by sharing will do much to restore the balance in the economy and reduce inequality. Recycling and repairing consumer goods instead of buying new fights the paradigm of unlimited consumption to prop up GDP and saves people money better spent on other things.

San Diego Free Press Has Suspended Publication as of Dec. 14, 2018

Let it be known that Frank Gormlie, Patty Jones, Doug Porter, Annie Lane, Brent Beltrán, Anna Daniels, and Rich Kacmar did something necessary and beautiful together for 6 1/2 years. Together, we advanced the cause of journalism by advancing the cause of justice. It has been a helluva ride. "Sometimes a great notion..." (Click here for more details)

#ResistanceSD logo; NASA photo from space of US at night

Click for the #ResistanceSD archives

Make a Non-Tax-Deductible Donation

donate-button

A Twitter List by SDFreePressorg

KNSJ 89.1 FM
Community independent radio of the people, by the people, for the people

"Play" buttonClick here to listen to KNSJ live online

At the OB Rag: OB Rag

Happenings in May for the Peninsula

Framing the News About Bicycling? Let’s Try ‘Safety First’

Mission Bay: From Wetlands to Resorts to Largest Aquatic Park on West Coast

City Council to Ponder Library and Rec Center Cuts — Cabrillo Set to Close

Petitions to Repeal Paid Parking at Balboa Park and Trash Tax Locations This Week

  • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Terms of Use

©2010-2017 SanDiegoFreePress.org

Code is Poetry

%d