
Photo Credit: Dimitri Naumov
Protected bike lanes help riders feel less exposed to danger, and are also appreciated by drivers and pedestrians, who know where to expect bicycles.
By Jay Walljasper / AlterNet
You can see big changes happening across North America as communities from Fairbanks to St. Petersburg transform their streets into appealing places for people, not just cars and trucks.
“Over the past five years we’re seeing an infrastructure revolution, a rethinking of our streets to accommodate more users—busways, public plazas, space for pedestrians and, of course, bike lanes,” says David Vega-Barachowitz of the National Association of City Transportation Officials. “More protected bike lanes is one of the most important parts of this.”
Protected bike lanes separate people on bikes from rushing traffic with concrete curbs, plastic bollards or other means— and sometimes offer additional safety measures such as special bike traffic lights and painted crossings at intersections. Protected bike lanes help riders feel less exposed to danger, and are also appreciated by drivers and pedestrians, who know where to expect bicycles. Streets work better when everyone has a clearly defined space.
The Continuing Evolution of Bicycling
Protected bike lanes are standard practice in the Netherlands, where 27 percent of all trips throughout the country are made on bicycles. That’s because more women, kids and seniors along with out-of-shape, inexperienced riders feel comfortable biking on the streets. Dutch bike ridership has doubled since the 1980s, when protected bike lanes began to be built in large numbers.
American communities, by contrast, paint bike lanes on the street, often squeezed between parked cars and busy traffic. With just a white line dividing bicyclists from vehicles, it’s no surprise that only a small percentage of Americans currently bike for transportation.
“Conventional bike lanes have not worked well to get new people on bikes— they serve mostly those already biking,” says Martha Roskowski, vice president of local innovation forPeopleForBikes. “It’s time to evolve the bike lane.”
Nearly two-thirds of Americans would bicycle more if they felt safer on the streets, reportsthe Federal Highway Administration. Protected bike lanes, along with public bike sharesystems, are two of the best ways to get more people out on bikes, according to a growing chorus of transportation leaders.
Protected lanes have recently popped up in more than 30 communities across the U.S. from Munhall, Pennsylvania, to Temple City, California, with many additional projects set to open later this year.
Bicycling Goes Mainstream
Montreal is North America’s pioneer in protected lanes. Inspired by Dutch, Danish and German examples, the city established a network of protected lanes that now covers more than 30 miles. The idea began to stir Americans’ imaginations in 2007 when New York mayor Michael Bloomberg and transportation commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan launched plans to tame the city’s mean streets. New York has since built 43 miles of protected lanes, withmeasurable results in safer streets and rising bike ridership.
New York’s first protected lanes provoked fierce opposition from a few people, but Paul White of the local bike and pedestrian advocacy group Transportation Alternatives says the public debate has now shifted to “Where’s mine? How come that neighborhood has safe streets and we don’t —don’t my kids matter as much as theirs?”
Chicago aims to catch up with New York, and has recently opened 23 miles of protected lanes. San Francisco has built 12 miles so far. “Wherever we can, we try to put in protected bike lanes,” stresses Seleta Reynolds, former Section Leader of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency who oversaw installation of many of San Francisco’s protected bike lanes. Reynolds was recently tapped by Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti to head the City’s Department of Transportation.
Other leaders in the field are Austin, Texas, with 9 miles and Washington, DC with 7 miles, including a highly visible route down Pennsylvania Avenue leading to the U.S. Capitol, which has tripled the number of people riding bikes on the street. More protected bike lanes are planned or under construction in all of these cities.
This year more than 100 cities submitted proposals to PeopleForBikes to be part of theGreen Lane Project, a competitive fellowship which offers cities financial, strategic and technical assistance valued at $250,000 per city to build or expand protected bike networks during a two-year period. Atlanta, Boston, Denver, Indianapolis, Pittsburgh and Seattle were selected in March to be the second round of Green Lane Project cities.
Just released research on protected bike lanes in five of the first-round Green Lane Project cities (Chicago, San Francisco, Austin, Washington D.C. and Portland) shows why so many communities are eager to follow their lead. The federal Department of Transportation-funded study found an increase of ridership from 21 to 142 percent on streets featuring protected lanes in the first year, with an average increase of 75 percent. Meanwhile evaluation of protected bike lanes by the city of New York found that traffic injuries declined for all road users (not just bicyclists) by an average of forty percent.
Beyond the White Stripe
What about the conventional bike lanes painted on the pavement — that simple white stripe we’ve grown used to? “They are the camel’s nose in the tent for growing bike use,” because they legitimize bicycling as transportation in the eyes of prospective riders and remind motorists to share the road, says Randy Neufeld, director of the SRAM Cycling Fund.
“Conventional bike lanes can work very well on a two-lane street with light traffic and slow speeds,” notes Roskowski. “But they are not enough for busy streets and fast traffic, which need an extra degree of separation between bicycles and motor vehicles.”
That’s the logic embraced by Dutch traffic engineers, which has doubled the number of bicyclists in the Netherlands. According to the Dutch Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic, physical separation of bicyclists from motor vehicles is recommended for any urban street with more than two lanes or where the speed limit exceeds 50 km per hour (31 mph).
One problem with conventional bike lanes is that they raise expectations beyond what they can deliver. “Cities all over the country painted stripes on busy streets, and when these lanes attract only a modest increase in bicyclists, city officials conclude there is only limited interest in bicycling,” notes PeopleForBikes president Tim Blumenthal. “A lot of people just won’t venture out on busy roads without a greater level of protection from traffic. That’s where protected bike lanes come in.”
Protected Bike Lanes Benefit Everyone, Not Just People Riding Bikes
“We are at a turning point in how we think about bikes,” explains Roskowksi. “This change is being driven by cities preparing for the future. Mayors, elected officials, business leaders and citizens want their cities to be resilient, sustainable and attractive, and they realize bikes and protected bike lanes can help achieve that. These new bike lanes make the streets safer for everyone and improve city life for people who will never even get on a bike.”
Here are key benefits of protected bike lanes enjoyed by the entire community:
Attract and Keep a Talented Workforce: Richard Florida, originator of the Creative Class strategy for urban prosperity, contends that safe, convenient bike lanes are important to communities that want to attract entrepreneurs and sought-after workers in creative fields—not just young hipsters, but those with kids too. “Traffic-free bike paths become especially important to them,” Florida said about young families in the New York Daily News.
Expand Economic Opportunities:Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel vowed to build 100 miles of protected bike lanes in his first term as part of a strategy to attract high-tech firms to the city. In Austin, Texas, Cirrus Logic, a computer company, moved from the suburbs to downtown two years ago because the area’s bike trails and plans for protected lanes made the firm “more attractive as an employer,” explains PR director Bill Schnell. “We can’t just pluck anybody for our jobs. The people we want are mostly younger, and biking is part of the equation for them.”
Boost Local Businesses: A study of protected bike lanes on 9th Avenue in New York City showed a 49 percent increase in retail sales at businesses on the street. Another study in San Francisco found 65 percent of merchants on Valencia Street reporting that protected bike lanes were good for business. A study done in Portland shows that customers arriving on bike buy 24 percent more at local businesses than those who drive.
Make the Streets Safer for Everyone: Not only are fewer bicyclists involved in accidents on streets with protected lanes, but pedestrians and motorists are safer too. A study of Columbus Avenue in New York City after protected bike lanes were added found a 34 percent decline in overall crashes.
Saving Municipalities Money: Building protected bike lanes to move more people is “dirt cheap to build compared to road projects,” says Gabe Klein, former transportation commissioner in Chicago and Washington, D.C. Cities of all sizes find that protected lanes can serve more people using existing infrastructure without the economic and environmental costs of widening streets.
Reduce Tension Between Bicyclists and Motorists:“If you actually give bicyclists a designated place in the road, they behave in a way that’s more conducive for everyone getting along,” explains Jim Merrell, campaign manager for the Chicago’s Active Transportation Alliance. He points to recent findings that bicyclists stop for red lights 161 percent more often at special bike signals on the city’s new Dearborn Avenue protected lanes. And a study of protected lanes on Chicago’s Kinzie Street shows that half of cyclists report improved motorist behavior on the street.
Ease Traffic Congestion: Chad Crager, interim Bicycling Program Manager in Austin, calculated that the city’s ambitious network of protected lanes will create significantly more street capacity downtown if only 15 percent of commuters living within three miles of downtown switch from cars to bikes and just seven percent of those living three-to-nine miles.
Decrease Pollution & Curb Climate Change: A person traveling four miles to work and four miles back on a bike every day instead of a car means 2000 pounds less carbon each year (which translates to a five percent reduction, downsizing the average Americans’ carbon footprint) as well as reductions in other pollutants fouling our air, according the Worldwatch Institute.
Jay Walljasper is a writer and speaker who explores how new ideas in urban planning, tourism, community development, sustainability, politics and culture can improve our lives as well as the world.
Until bike riders realize that the laws affect them also, I think this is way out of proportion. If I hit someone because they didn’t stop at the stop sign; if I kill someone because they decided to come up along side of me on the right when my right hand turn signal was flashing I was going to make a turn; Until the bike rider realizes that he is not the only vehicle on the road, I will not support this wholesale “make the streets safer for everyone.” Because the streets are NOT safer; because there are accidents everyday; because the bike riders are arrogant and think they own the road; a lot more education is necessary for me to by-in to the program.
I know you didn’t write your comment to talk about your own ability to drive safely but what you wrote is concerning. Make sure when you are going to turn right you do like you said and signal, SCAN and MOVE to the right before the turn so that straight through traffic naturally moves around you to the left. This is basic DMV handbook stuff, you might want to buff up on your CVC. It is probably related to your perceived difficulties. If you aren’t good with all the law stuff just remember this: DO NOT KILL.
Think of the car as a tank and the bike as a dog. Then you won’t have to worry so much about what might become of the dog.
Judi, tens of thousands of people are needlessly injured or killed each year in the U.S. by drivers speeding, driving drunk or inattention (e.g., cell phones). While it doesn’t excuse bad bicyclist behavior, it far exceeds the small number of injuries caused by bicyclists. Where is your outrage toward this greater problem of bad driver behavior?
I’ve noticed a pattern in your comments, particularly relating to density: that what’s best for you is therefore best for the community. So I’m asking you to put yourself in others’ shoes once in a while. In this case, please consider that the majority of bicyclists (like myself) ride safely, yet have experienced life-threatening drivers.
Hi Judi and Bob,
I am very surprised and very disappointed to read your comments.
I want to address your comments a bit different than Mr. Dion’s excellent points.
Judi, you have written this elsewhere, “The greatest nation in the world still balks at taking care of its inhabitants, yet we send money overseas all the time to help people in other nations. When are we going to start taking care of our people right here?”. I don’t have to belabor a fairly obvious point but I will because I am alarmed at the hostility you seem to exhibit against another human being, a fellow San Diegan simply because they are riding on a bicycle.
The U.S. is a net importer of oil which is used as a source of fuel for the automobiles that we drive. By driving a vehicle we are continuing to send our money to other nations instead of spending our money on our own people right here, many of whom ride a bicycle in this city, or would like the option to ride a bicycle in this city. John Anderson has written about much money evaporates from our local economy [http://sandiegofreepress.org/2013/11/average-car-costs-9000-annually-what-else-could-you-buy-with-that-much-money/] as a result of our auto-centric policies – doesn’t that bother you? The number of human beings that have been killed by other drivers in this country exceeds 35,000 annually. I am not even mentioning the high number of serious, debilitating injuries resulting from the actions of drivers and yet you don’t seem to care about the havoc caused on our city streets by drivers. Speeding is commonplace in San Diego as are any other number of lawbreaking activities caused by drivers. Why aren’t you addressing the significant danger they possess to public safety? I do not understand why you seem to relish demonizing the cyclist that is simply trying to get around the city.
To borrow one of your statements, when are we going to start taking care of our people right here, many of whom ride a bicycle?
Bob, you have written this elsewhere, “My own suspicion is, the U-T and VOSD have gone around the bend in much the same way and for the same reasons as the Republicans in general have. They perceive so many threats out there to their privileged positions that it’s going to be difficult for either Republicans or the captive press to climb down from the paranoia many of them suffer.” Where is your compassion for people? Why do I sense that you are threatened by the mere sight of a cyclist? What harm have they done that troubles you so much? Is this sneering comment emblematic of the progressive ethos that you are so proud to embody?
If this is the sentiment expressed publicly by supposed progressives, it is no wonder that our streets continue to be dominated by the automobile.
My language may have been too indirect. I was trying to infer that cars are like tanks and cyclists like dogs and that if Ms. Curry were to receive the cyclist with even nearly the same high regard she might give a dog than there would be nothing to worry about.
Aside from that I want to be entered in the cyclist category. I ride my bike as often as I can. And thanks for that quote.
It is apparently a surprise to some people that public roadways are supposed to serve all of us, not just those using motor vehicles. We all, yes all, pay for and benefit from a good roadway system for travel, delivery of goods, emergency response, etc. Presently special new roadway markings and signs seem to be necessary to remind everyone that bicycling belongs. Special physical protection from motor vehicle driver errors seems necessary in some circumstances to keep us all safer.
Re-learning how to share the sometimes limited roadway space and to accommodate the differing capabilities among people using cars, bikes, and walking is apparently challenging for some people. As should be apparent, it is important that we learn to choose wisely how we get around – many times using a motor vehicle isn’t a best choice – the costs both personal and to our environment can be reduced by sometimes using more sustainable travel modes – walking, biking, and transit.
Maybe early childhood education and other training for adults could be beefed up – about how motorists and bicyclists are to yield to pedestrians at marked AND unmarked crosswalks, how we all should lawfully “take turns” at intersections obeying traffic controls, how Sharing the Road sometimes means side-by-side and other times means in-line sharing waiting behind someone going slower than us until it’s safe to pass, staying to the right when it is safe if we are going slower than others, and passing each other on the left when going faster… Kindergarten stuff.
Let’s learn to get along together.
Judi – Since you seem to know how exactly one is supposed to ride a bike, why aren’t you out there cycling and setting a good example to all the arrogant cyclists?