Electric vehicles are on the verge of disrupting energy markets.
By Emily Schwartz Greco / OtherWords
Back in 1898, New York City hosted a global environmental summit. Flummoxed, the assembled experts disbanded early without agreeing on workable solutions.
What daunting crisis brought about this precursor of today’s big UN climate conferences?
Fast-growing cities were propelling travel via horse-drawn buggies and wagons to unprecedented and unsustainable levels. Staggering quantities of equine manure and urine made urban life hazardous and stinky, Clemson University assistant professor Eric Morris explains in his colorful essay From Horse Power to Horsepower.
Within 20 years, the primary transportation mode since the dawn of civilization had hung up its horseshoes. Newfound businesses mass-produced affordable cars and trucks, sold vehicles on credit, and persuaded governments to build paved roadways and highways.
In short, market forces prevailed. Why can’t that happen again with climate change?
Replacing fossil fuels as the dominant power source — including for transportation —should be a no-brainer. But governments won’t outlaw gasoline or diesel anytime soon. Nor will Big Brother ramp up regulations fast enough to drive Big Oil out of business.
With motorized conveyances spewing more than a quarter of the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions, there’s one good reason to hope that drivers spurn their internal combustion engines sooner rather than later: plug-in horseless carriages.
Experts expect spending on electric vehicles to top $100 billion a year by 2019, including up to a quarter of Ford’s fleet. Some 665,000 of them are already on the world’s roads.
Tesla aims to sell 55,000 of its electric cars in 2015 and 500,000 per year by the end of this decade. Once its first non-luxury models hit the road, the company might make a dent in the 16 million new vehicles Americans buy every year, along with demand for gasoline.
As Alberta Oil magazine puts it, the upstart’s sexy cars could “signal the beginning of the end of oil.”
Tesla may lack sales volume so far, yet it’s long on cachet. Car writers are drooling over its Model X, a family-friendly seven-seater that will hit the road soon. The crossover’s James Bond-esque falcon-wing doors lift straight up. The thing looks more like a robotic bird of prey eying its next victim than a minivan.
Tesla chief Elon Musk is also investing heavily in solar power and the kind of battery storage technology that will maximize the odds that his cars will be powered by renewable energy. He and his competitors just might do to fossil fuels what Henry Ford did to the demand for horse-drawn transportation. That’s huge.
Electric vehicles propelled by coal, natural gas, and nuclear energy aren’t exactly green. They wouldn’t stave off a full-blown climate crisis, even if they did send the oil industry into a tailspin. But by boosting demand for localized solar power, the electric car industry could accelerate the coal industry’s demise and depress demand for electricity generated from natural gas.
When Geoff Ralston — the guy who created Yahoo’s email in 1997 — gazes at the automotive industry in his crystal ball, he sees a repeat of what occurred over the past decade with our omnipresent e-gadgetry.
Once gas stations begin to shut down, “owning a gasoline-powered car will positively suck,” Ralston predicts. “Then, there will be a rush to electric cars not seen since, well, the rush to buy smartphones… The future of automotive transportation is an electric one, and you can expect that future to be here soon.”
If you don’t agree, try studying the history of urban horse manure management. It may change your mind.
We’ve had our all-electric Nissan LEAF since December of 2011. I bought it because Nissan was the first large manufacturer to offer a fully electric car that one could actually BUY (unlike GM’s very popular EV-1, which was ahead of it’s time, see “Who Killed The Electric Car” for more on that). I know they’re losing money on it for now, but they will have a large, faithful following when the price of gas makes the ICE alternatives less attractive. Dealers make most of their money on the after-sale and my LEAF costs me almost NOTHING to operate. I’ve got over 40,000 miles on it in three and a half years, I’ve bought a set of tires (the stock ones were crap), a set of wiper blades, and a passenger compartment air filter–and THAT’S IT–no oil changes, no tune ups, no servicing at all beyond tapping the computer to print out a battery performance record for the five-year/60,000 mile warranty (the first two required annual checks are free). It’s VERY fun to drive, almost totally silent, produces almost zero emissions (ok, some tire dust plus whatever it cost to produce the car and my solar panels), seats five adults comfortably (my son’s 6’4″), and I can use the diamond/carpool lane solo, which (depending on your commute) can give you back an hour of your day or even more. I charge it from my home solar system (mostly, and there are many public stations available when needed) or buy the power from SDG&E during “super off-peak” (midnight to 5am) for the cheapest rates. I can switch on/off the A/C or heater from my smart phone, send routes to the on-board nav system, XM radio, bluetooth to my phone/mp3 player, etc. My first year model has a back-up camera, but the subsequent models have FOUR cameras that give you a 360* bird’s-eye view that makes parking in the middle of your parking space a bit like docking the space shuttle or playing a video game–you can see EVERYTHING around you!
If the battery drops to below 80% of original charge capacity within that 5 year period, Nissan will even replace my battery under warranty. My Scion xB (Toyota) that gets almost 30mpg costs me almost 18-20¢/mile to drive, while the LEAF costs only about 4-5¢/mile.
I’ve got battery back up on my solar system at home so I don’t even need the grid (with some modifications). When the manure strikes the ventilator I’ll still be able to drive 100 miles a day off of the sun. It’s kind of like installing solar power while paying the second highest utility rates in the country in SoCal under SDG&E tyranny (or the GOP presidential line-up): it’s a no-brainer. ;-)