By Norma Damashek
It’s enough to make you cringe, the way they toy with our mayor – those brawny Chargers/ Rams/ Raiders sports team owners, our insatiable hotel magnates, those downtown real estate purveyors, our Chamber of Commerce henchmen. So many entitled guys diddling with our small-time politicians just for the fun of it, passing the time until they clinch their publicly-subsidized, taxpayer-financed killer deals.
But our mayor is a good-natured sport. He wears his what-me-worry grin even when he’s left flapping in the breeze, flailing like wet underwear strung up on the clothesline to dry. One minute limp and aimless. The next minute puffed up and billowing like a hot-air facsimile of a political contender hoping to score in big-boy Republican Party politics.
If presidential candidate Bernie Sanders is right about our country’s soul being captured by mega-rich plutocrats bent on controlling the nation’s politics and economy, these megalomaniacs must have done their internships in San Diego.
Throughout much of our city’s history we’ve been in thrall to a cadre of interlocking big business elites who manipulate government policy and political leadership with impunity. It’s so ingrained, it passes for normal in this big/small town of ours.
It’s why someone as inconsequential and vacuous as mayor Kevin Faulconer – a man whose landmark accomplishment as a city councilmember was preserving beach fire pits – can posture as a big-city politician with no pushback from the public. It’s why he’s able to run unopposed for another term in office (the local Democratic Party has a lot to answer for on this front, I’d say).
It’s why someone as lightweight and ineffectual as this public-relations-trained mayor is testing the waters for governorship of the entire state of California (ludicrous and insulting, I’d say).
It’s why mayor Faulconer was a no-show at SANDAG’s regional planning meeting this month when he should have been there to vocally lobby hard and fierce for transit funding to back up his posturing over a strong climate action plan for the city (put your money where your mouth is, I’d say).
It’s why our mayor was listed as a speaker at the recent ALEC conference held in San Diego. To refresh your memory: ALEC is the American Legislative Exchange Council, a Koch brothers/tobacco industry-funded conservative conglomerate of legislators and corporate lobbyists who create and promote model bills and resolutions that advance “free-enterprise” objectives like minimizing corporate regulation, reducing taxation, loosening environmental regulations, tightening voter ID rules, weakening labor unions, and promoting gun rights (notice that for San Diego constituents Faulconer hides behind a sun-kissed, politically moderate mask – a man for all seasons and political preferences. A cynical deception, I’d say).
Bottom line: maybe we shouldn’t be feeling sorry for poor mayor Faulconer, after all.
Maybe we should be feeling more compassion and indignation for ourselves, the regular people of San Diego: residents and community activists, neighbors and civic caretakers, voters and grassroots reformers. We’re the ones who’ve been hung out to dry by many of the officials we elect. And by the people they answer to.
Think about this: over ten years ago our City Charter was drastically amended to beef up the status of the mayor from head honcho of the city council to chief executive officer of the entire city.
This “strong mayor” amendment was sold to voters with a promise that San Diegans would henceforth know where the buck stops. The new “strong mayor” – not some appointed city manager – would be accountable for running the city, for getting the people’s work done, for snapping the whip over city departments, for delivering efficiency and excellent performance, for serving the public good.
True to its word, the “strong mayor” amendment freed the mayor from the city council. Mayor Kevin Faulconer (already attached at the hip to his horse whisperer, ex-strong mayor Jerry Sanders) came into office with considerably more political power – at least on paper – than old-timers like Frank Curran, Pete Wilson, Roger Hedgecock, Maureen O’Connor, Susan Golding, and Dick Murphy, all of whom served as mayor under the bygone city manager form of government.
But the City Charter “strong mayor” amendment failed to free the mayor from the professional manipulators and ventriloquists who comprise San Diego’s ruling junta and who operate under a seemingly irrevocable, never-expiring private contract to use city government for their exclusive financial games and gains.
A requirement for courage, integrity, independence, and intelligent leadership in San Diego’s political arena – that’s the only City Charter amendment we really need. I’m not necessarily a Bernie Sanders acolyte, but the public benefit of a small political revolution in San Diego is pretty obvious. I’d say.
John Lawrence says
Love all the analogies and metaphors in this post. A billowing pair of Long Johns hanging on a clothesline certainly characterizes our current Mayor.
bob dorn says
Kevin Faulconer’s not Mayor of San Diego, Jerry Sanders is. Kevin Faulconer is a public relations good boy, an ad guy without a good writer; he’s the buy, not the content. He might be a little stoopid, to boot. Just right for America’s Finest City, at this, it’s lowest moment. He’d be eaten up in Sacramento, like what’s-his-name McCarthy was in D.C. by the Tea Drinkers in Congress.
Norma Damashek for mayor?
Thank you for sharing. There are some residents that are fairly new to San Diego and it seems difficult to get the history of things. Love reading San Diego Free Press, always take away something new that I learned. I just can’t understand why it is that voters are not holding their elected officials feet to the fire? Now I must learn why there isn’t a candidate from the other party running against Faulkner.
“I just can’t understand why it is that voters are not holding their elected officials feet to the fire?”
Your comment reflected precisely the problem: the overwhelming majority of local media (TV stations, Union Tribune) support the conservative politicians and have supported them historically. For background, read UNDER THE PERFECT SUN by Jim Miller, (a SDFP contributor), Mike Davis, and Kelly Mayhew.
Demographics and gerrymandering segregate voting populations, making consensus for change difficult. Issues that affect most groups, such as energy and water related issues, tend to attract large crowds at hearings, but the corporate lawyers and their PR representatives present extremely polished arguments, and therefore, are highly effective and possibly intimidating persuaders.
“Now I must learn why there isn’t a candidate from the other party running against Faulkner.”
Please share your research with SDFP readers: we’d like to know, too.
Jamie Edmonds says