• Home
  • Subscribe!
  • About Us / FAQ
  • Staff
  • Columns
  • Awards
  • Terms of Use
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Contact
  • OB Rag
  • Donate

San Diego Free Press

Grassroots News & Progressive Views

Breaking News: Poll Shows California Pension Ballot Measures Already in Trouble

December 17, 2015 by Source

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • More
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp

By Dan Braun & Bill Raden / Capital & Main

Ballot box graphic

(Photo: openDemocracy/Flickr/CC)

A pair of potential ballot initiatives written to overhaul California’s public pensions could face a rough road, according to a new poll.

The results from a Capital & Main-David Binder Research poll of 500 likely voters shows that if the election were held today, the numbers of those voting for the measures and those against them appear to be dead even. Those numbers are not what pension-reduction advocates had hoped for going into the 2016 election cycle.

Drafted by former Democratic San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed and former Republican San Diego City Councilman Carl DeMaio, the so-called Voter Empowerment Initiative, and its sibling, the Government Pension Cap Act, received their official summary language (though not their official titles) from the state attorney general last week. Low numbers and lack of support among DeMaio’s fellow Republicans had already forced the pair to abandon a previous effort, the Voter Empowerment Act, last August. But the new polling data don’t hold the bulletproof voter support for either proposal that Reed has said he is counting on.

The first measure, which would move new state and local employees from traditional defined benefit pensions into 401(k)-style retirement savings plans, tested at 42 percent in support and 42 percent opposed; its sibling measure, which would cap the amount of money government employers could pay for most new hires’ retirement benefits at no more than 11 percent of wages, or a maximum of 13 percent for public safety workers, found 40 percent support and 40 percent opposed. The poll, conducted between December 10-13, has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percent.

Last week Reed told the Sacramento Bee that one of the measures would need to test at least at 60 percent to withstand the erosion expected in a heated campaign and to attract the roughly $2 million to $3 million needed for a three-month signature collection drive. After qualifying, the effort would need another $25 million to run a statewide campaign.

“Generally an even split at this early stage does not bode well for an initiative,” said Floyd Feeney, a professor at the University of California Davis School of Law, in an email to Capital & Main. “Initiatives as a group tend to lose support as the battle progresses. This is a tendency, however, and not an ironclad rule. Money also counts.” Feeney has written two books on ballot initiatives and served as legal advisor to the Speaker’s Commission on the California Initiative Process in 2000-01.

Veteran Republican political consultant Mike Madrid, of the Sacramento-based Grassroots Lab, said the pension-ballot poll’s dead-heat numbers aren’t impossible to surmount but will present daunting challenges for those seeking to reduce pensions. Especially in a 2016 election cycle that already includes a presidential race, a U.S. Senate seat up for grabs, and a ballot that could have as many as 20 other initiatives.

“What you’ve got is this mushy middle that can be moved with money and argument in either direction,” he said. “People are going to be sick of campaign ads by about early October. When there’s that many political messages coming at you, the voters just tune out. Unless it’s something like legalizing marijuana, or ending the death penalty or porn actors having to wear condoms.”

Opponents of the proposals, chiefly within organized labor, have expressed confidence that they would be able to erode support for the measures further if a campaign were to proceed. Last April political analyst Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, when asked about Reed and DeMaio’s Voter Empowerment Act, told Capital & Main, “There is an axiom in politics: It is the group whose rights are threatened that generally comes out to vote, no matter the group. And with unions, they do it every election. And they’ve got money and they’ve got organization.”


Dan Braun works with unions, social justice groups and others engaged in creative change campaigns. He lives and drums in Echo Park, Los Angeles.

Bill Raden is a freelance Los Angeles writer.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
Source

Source

Source

Latest posts by Source (see all)

  • And Then They Came for the Vietnamese… - December 13, 2018
  • Amazon’s Disturbing Plan to Add Face Surveillance to Your Front Door - December 13, 2018
  • 140+ Arrested as Youth-Led Protests Demand Green New Deal on Capitol Hill - December 11, 2018

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Filed Under: Business, Economy, Government, Labor, Politics

« Working Until It’s Time for Your Grave
HUD Bureaucrats to San Diego’s Homeless Service Providers: My Way or the Highway »

Comments

  1. John Lawrence says

    December 17, 2015 at 6:21 pm

    Anyone who would vote to replace their traditional pension with a 401(k) is an idiot.

  2. MJ says

    January 9, 2016 at 10:59 pm

    How about an initiative capping post-retirement benefits at 80k annually and requiring the savings be spent on social housing, mental health, and public education? I see nothing progressive in diverting public funds that could be spent on the neediest into lifelong support for Baby Boomer sponges in the upper middle-class. At what point does solidarity mean spoiled public-safety workers standing up for the real working class, and not the other way round?

    • Doug Porter says

      January 10, 2016 at 11:05 am

      I’m all for “MJ’s” proposal, starting the day AFTER a maximum wage law goes into force. I think $160,000 is a good number and we can index it to inflation as long as the $15 minimum wage, disability, social security and pensions are also indexed.

San Diego Free Press Has Suspended Publication as of Dec. 14, 2018

Let it be known that Frank Gormlie, Patty Jones, Doug Porter, Annie Lane, Brent Beltrán, Anna Daniels, and Rich Kacmar did something necessary and beautiful together for 6 1/2 years. Together, we advanced the cause of journalism by advancing the cause of justice. It has been a helluva ride. "Sometimes a great notion..." (Click here for more details)

#ResistanceSD logo; NASA photo from space of US at night

Click for the #ResistanceSD archives

Make a Non-Tax-Deductible Donation

donate-button

A Twitter List by SDFreePressorg

KNSJ 89.1 FM
Community independent radio of the people, by the people, for the people

"Play" buttonClick here to listen to KNSJ live online

At the OB Rag: OB Rag

Community Coalition Bulletin: This Week at City Hall — April 6-10, 2026

Race for Issa’s Seat: Desmond Is a ‘Formidable Opponent’

‘San Diego Surf Heroes Going Back to 1910 — When Duke Kahanamoku Tried the OB Pier.’

June Primary: 4 Democrats Vie for District 8 Seat on San Diego City Council

More Photos from San Diego’s No Kings — A Week Later

  • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Terms of Use

©2010-2017 SanDiegoFreePress.org

Code is Poetry

%d