By Robert B. Reich / RobertReich.org
With the Democratic primaries grinding to a bitter end, I have suggestions for both Clinton and Sanders supporters that neither will like.
First, my advice to Clinton supporters: Don’t try to drum Bernie Sanders out of the race before Hillary Clinton officially gets the nomination (if she in fact does get it).
Some of you say Bernie should bow out because he has no chance of getting the nomination, and his continuing candidacy is harming Hillary Clinton’s chances.
It’s true that Bernie’s chances are slim, but it’s inaccurate to say he has no chance. If you consider only pledged delegates, who have been selected in caucuses and primaries, he’s not all that far behind Hillary Clinton. And the upcoming primary in California – the nation’s most populous state – could possibly alter Sanders’s and Clinton’s relative tallies.
My calculation doesn’t include so-called “superdelegates” – Democratic office holders and other insiders who haven’t been selected through primaries and caucuses. But in this year of anti-establishment fury, it would be unwise for Hillary Clinton to relay on superdelegates to get her over the finish line.
Sanders should stay in the race also because he has attracted a large number of young people and independents. Their passion, excitement, and enthusiasm are critically important to Hillary Clinton’s success, if she’s the nominee, as well the success of other Democrats this year, and, more fundamentally, to the future of American politics.
Finally and not the least, Sanders has been telling a basic truth about the American political economic system – that growing inequality of income and wealth has led inexorably to the increasing political power of those at the top, including big corporations and Wall Street banks. And that political power has stacked the deck in their favor, leading to still wider inequality.
Nothing important can be accomplished – reversing climate change, creating true equal opportunity, overcoming racism, rebuilding the middle class, having a sane and sensible foreign policy – until we reclaim our democracy from the moneyed interests. The longer Bernie Sanders is on stage to deliver this message, the better.
Next, my advice for Sanders supporters: Be prepared to work hard for Hillary Clinton if she gets the nomination.
Some of you say that refusing to fight for or even vote for Hillary will show the Democratic political establishment why it must change its ways.
But the “Democratic political establishment” is nothing but a bunch of people, many of them big donors and fundraisers occupying comfortable and privileged positions, who won’t even be aware that you’ve decided to sit it out – unless Hillary loses to Donald Trump.
Which brings me to those of you who say there’s no real difference between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
That’s just plain wrong. Trump has revealed himself to be a narcissistic, xenophobic, hatemonger who, if elected, would legitimize bigotry, appoint Supreme Court justices with terrible values, and have direct access to the button that could set off a nuclear war.
Hillary may not possess Bernie Sanders’s indignation about the rigging of our economy and democracy, or be willing to go as far in remedying it, but she’s shown herself a capable and responsible leader.
Some of you agree a Trump presidency would be a disaster but claim it would galvanize a forceful progressive movement in response.
That’s unlikely. Rarely if ever in history has a sharp swing to the right moved the political pendulum further back in the opposite direction. Instead, it tends to move the “center” rightward, as did Ronald Reagan’s presidency.
Besides, Trump could do huge and unalterable damage to America and the world in the meantime.
Finally, some of you say even if Hillary is better than Trump, you’re tired of choosing the “lesser of two evils,” and you’re going to vote your conscience by either writing Bernie’s name in, or voting for the Green Party candidate, or not voting at all.
I can’t criticize anyone for voting their conscience, of course. But your conscience should know that a decision not to vote for Hillary, should she become the Democratic nominee, is a de facto decision to help Donald Trump.
Both of my morsels of advice may be hard to swallow. Many Hillary supporters don’t want Bernie to keep campaigning, and many Bernie supporters don’t want to root for Hillary if she gets the nomination.
But swallow it you must – not just for the good of the Democratic Party, but for the good of the nation.
______________
Robert Reich, one of the nation’s leading experts on work and the economy, is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. Time Magazine has named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including his latest best-seller, Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future; The Work of Nations; Locked in the Cabinet; Supercapitalism; and his newest, Beyond Outrage. His syndicated columns, television appearances, and public radio commentaries reach millions of people each week. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, and Chairman of the citizen’s group Common Cause. His widely-read blog can be found at www.robertreich.org.
hOw about this No Marketable Job Skills? Here Is Your Perfect Job!
Want a job that pays $400,000.00 a year and you don’t have to know a thing to get it? Want lifetime pension and secret service protection for free? Well, you are in luck! In November, there is a job opening that needs to be filled – PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
Yes, there it is, I said it. Aside from their citizenship and age minimum, there are no requirements to be POTUS. They do not need to able to think, to debate, to compromise, to propose good legislation and get it passed. Convicted felon? That will stop you from voting in many states, but you can be president.
The odd thing about it of course, is that the clerical staff, paraprofessional support team, even the housekeeping staff have to demonstrate that they have required job skills. Interviews and often testing will confirm those skills. A business can require many interviews with lots of in depth discussion about the field that help reveal a potential employee’s values. Background checks, credit checks and even drug testing are all routine for those seeking professional jobs. Most professional jobs require college degrees, but not for POTUS.
That being said, is it any wonder that this year stunningly unqualified candidates are running for office? People with diagnosable personality disorders are in serious contention for one of the most powerful positions on the planet. However, nowhere is it written that the POTUS needs to demonstrate knowledge of history and foreign policy, of diplomacy or governance.
Americans want a president that is a strong leader, a principled person who is committed to the constitutional rule of the country and to the wellbeing of the citizens within it. It requires a broad skill set, a strong moral compass, an ability to bring people together and to work toward the common good of all Americans. And if this is what we want, what qualifications would we expect the best candidates to possess?
Perhaps the crux of the matter is why do candidates “run for office” instead of “apply for a job”? Why is it more important to shake a candidate’s hand than to examine his professional skills and psychological fitness to hold office? We are seeing the current roster of mostly unqualified candidates today because we didn’t define and hold them to a set of standards that reflect what they bring to the table as candidates. It would be impossible for a healthy business to run this way. It certainly has not been healthy for this country.
In the past it has been argued that the process of running for office would somehow reveal the best candidate but in 2016, there is virtually no journalistic integrity so as a populous, we are completely at the mercy of what they think is important for us to know. Broadcast media has made themselves obsolete by refusing to report the news. They make news, they distort news, they ignore news and they use news to sway mass opinion. So today, they flood their shows with sensational journalism, with superficial chatter and blatant propaganda, instead of genuine investigative journalism.
It is therefore appropriate to call on congress and the current administration to develop a reasonable job description, skills requirements, academic requirements, government experience and psychological testing for candidates for POTUS. This will give citizens a more focused and appropriate way to determine who should be hired for the job. It will also give a forum to discuss what, as a nation, we want our leader to do.
Very interesting article that no major news media seems willing to investigate: