By Norma Damashek / NumbersRunner
PART I
We’ll start with a trick question: Is Mayor Kevin Faulconer the mirror image of President Donald Trump? No, of course not! you’d probably say.
Kevin Faulconer is a pleasant, if unremarkable, go-along-to-get-along San Diego city councilman turned mayor:
“…born and raised in Oxnard California… learned to speak Spanish in grade school… San Diego State University… member of the Kappa Sigma fraternity… one year as Student Body President of Associated Students. He and his wife Katherine, a small business owner, live in Point Loma with their two children. Before running for office… executive with the public relations firm NCG Porter Novelli and volunteered on the Mission Bay Park Committee…” (see Wikipedia)
You might say that Kevin Faulconer is a lightweight Republican who goes down nice and easy in a city like San Diego. He is decorum incarnate – never an unguarded sneer, never an unscripted rant.
You might even say that he mirrors Melania Trump more than the Donald. Melania’s insouciant aura serves as a glamorous distraction from her husband’s crude and reckless nature. Likewise, Faulconer’s low-keyed persona serves as a disarming distraction from the leadership vacuum on the 12th floor of City Hall.
Kevin Faulconer’s problem is that he’s an embarrassment to his constituents. For how many years did the Spanos syndicate manipulate and extort this mayor? How many times did they slap him silly while he kept coming back for more?
But Faulconer’s problems go far deeper than being dumped by the Chargers. We’ve got a mayor who is incapable of taking clear, decisive stands on big civic issues, whether it’s a sports stadium, or Convention Center, or racial profiling by city police officers, or actualizing strong environmental programs. He walks on eggshells, even over keeping our police force out of the immigration enforcement business. He shuns the stage at city demonstrations and marches. Ribbon cutting events, that’s where you’ll usually find him. (So who can explain why he ignored public outcry and readily mounted the stage to meet and greet at the super-conservative American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) conference held in San Diego a couple of years ago?)
We’ve got a mayor who, since the day he stepped into office, has neglected the city’s festering problems of relentlessly worsening homelessness; rising poverty levels; looming budget cuts; a housing crisis that turns rent and mortgage payments into a monthly scramble…
We’ve got a mayor who issues limp declarations of Action! Accountability! A New Day in San Diego! in response to the ballooning backlog of street and road repairs, or spiking pension obligations and chronic threat of municipal bankruptcy, or burst water mains and standstill traffic in already overburdened neighborhoods (laughably slated for increased density and development).
In his latest State of the City address the mayor’s to-do list is a hodgepodge of sound-bites. But where are the concrete remedies? For him, Action means making the city an Official, Regional Autonomous Vehicle Pilot Location. For him, Accountability means installing jagged rocks under freeway overpasses to get rid of homeless sleepers.
For him, A New Day in San Diego! might mean the Camp Hope approach of clearing the homeless off the streets and stowing them in a tarted-up tent city at the Mexican border, out of sight and out of mind. Will this mayor really give his blessings to our very own Hooverville?
We’ve got a mayor who has not delivered the goods. Pleasant though he may be, he lacks the independence, imagination, backbone, and political moxie to do right by our city.
PART II
Once upon a time when I was an active player with the League of Women Voters, the powers-that-be convinced the San Diego public that it was time to become a dynamic metropolis like Los Angeles or Chicago or even New York City. So voters agreed to replace our purportedly provincial city manager form of government with a strong mayor system.
Back then the big worry for the LWV was that – in a politically low-energy city like ours – concentrated power in the hands of a strong mayor would decrease public accountability and invite corruption.
Back then we also worried about how trading in an independent, professional city manager for a political appointee to run city departments, operations, contracts, budgets, and workers would work out. Turns out we were right to worry.
Our first “strong mayor” was Jerry Sanders. He never succeeded in being his own man. During his two terms in office he dutifully kept the city exactly where it had always been: in the hands of an ossified downtown fraternity of hoteliers, developers, bankers, and assorted business interests. He persists to this day as a well-compensated mouthpiece for the Chamber of Commerce.
Our second “strong mayor” was Bob Filner. He was willing and able to express his independence, imagination, backbone, and political moxie to promote a politically liberal agenda for the city. But he proved too undisciplined for his own good. And too threatening to old-guard Republicans.
As it turns out, he was also too threatening to self-professed progressive Democrats like then-councilman (and current California state assemblymember) Todd Gloria and then-San Diego/Imperial Counties Labor Council secretary-treasurer (and current California state assemblymember) Lorena Gonzalez and her clandestine mayoral ambitions for then-close companion (and current husband) Nathan Fletcher. In an unprecedented palace coup, the city’s first bona fide strong mayor was unceremoniously drummed out of office.
Our third “strong mayor” is Kevin Faulconer. He’s a chip off the old Sanders block. We are back to waiting for the basic benefits promised to us when we gave up the old city manager government and brought in the strong mayor system – things like transparency, accountability, government efficiency, and dynamic governance.
We were promised we’d know where the buck stops… we’d know who is in charge. Do you know who’s responsible for what goes on in our city? Do you know who’s in charge? Do you ever think to pick up your phone to call your mayor?
PART III
We’ll end with the trick question: Is Kevin Faulconer the mirror image of Donald Trump? Of course not! you’d probably still say. There’s a world of difference between a public relations puppet and a dangerous, unstable, bullying megalomaniac.
But look again at the uncanny similarities. You’ll see that neither is doing right by our citizens. You’ll see that, so far, neither deserves the public trust.
Here’s the big difference: our mayor is within reach, right at our fingertips. We elected a “strong mayor” to be in charge, to be accountable, and to be responsible for what goes on in our city.
We voters need to check our own mirrors, if only to remind ourselves that we elected our mayor to do right by our city. And it’s our job to hold his feet to the fire and not let him forget that HE is where the buck stops.
Latest posts by Norma Damashek (see all)
- County Government Laid Bare - November 15, 2017
- Hierarchy of Elected Venerables - October 30, 2017
- San Diego’s Dangling Participles - October 12, 2017
Kevin Faulconer is not a strong mayor. He governs as a weak one. His whole approach is to maintain the status quo, the status quo which is what most Republicans want. He certainly does not want to take chances with anything controversial.
On the other hand the removal of Bob Filner was much more than a “palace coup.” He had crossed numerous boundaries with numerous women. That was well documented. Other than that he was a good mayor especially in terms of the Democratic agenda. Too bad he was too flawed on a personal level.
As far as Camp Hope, not a bad idea except for the location – 13 miles from downtown, in the middle of nowhere. Not sure the bus/trolley links are sufficient. The general idea, when you look at the details, is pretty good, but should be located closer to downtown where most of the current homeless services are.
Great job, Norma D. Underneath Faulconer’s happy-boy exterior must lie a strange combination of ambition and fear of others’ power. Or maybe that combination isn’t foreign to politicians in general. So he plays it safe, and smiles a lot. The problem we have as a city is that we tolerate this kind of mediocrity in our putative leaders.
I will never forget the video that emerged shortly after Faulconer’s elevation, of Hizzoner with Jerry Sanders and Todd Gloria tagging along on a ride on some Whoopee Overhead gondola and them high-fiving each other. It was Disneyland Meets Sitcom.
This guy is mediocre. You wrote about Faulconer’s image that::
“We were promised we’d know where the buck stops… we’d know who is in charge.” He was in charge of naming his Balboa Park Commission years ago — a body led by his spokesperson Gerry Braun. That commission was disbanded shortly after it was found that it spent $3 Millions and did absulutely nothing. No one could explain in print what happened to the money, other than the checks mailed out to public relations consultants. Pit this guy in the gubernatorial election against the new attorney general or state Senate leader and he’ll come back to San Diego to start up a pizza joint. No offense to the pizza joint owners, who don’t pretend to be political leaders.
We’ve got a mayor who is incapable of taking clear, decisive stands on big civic issues, whether it’s a sports stadium, or Convention Center, or racial profiling by city police officers, or actualizing strong environmental programs. He walks on eggshells, even over keeping our police force out of the immigration enforcement business. He shuns the stage at city demonstrations and marches. Ribbon cutting events, that’s where you’ll usually find him.
I always love your writing and insight Norma. Corporate sycophant Kevin Faulconer – I keep hearing Republican aspirations for him as governor. I wonder whether the true story of his performance as mayor will see light in a gubernatorial campaign. As for Filner, deserved or not, I whole-heartedly agree with your description of his removal as a “palace coup.” It’s always surprising to me that San Diegans look right past how it was done, focusing solely on if it was deserved. We have processes (legal and political) and rule of law in this country. The sexual harassment accusations had an adequate remedy in the civil court system. Whether he held office should have been decided via the recall petition and election. His removal was via a closed-door insider process, in which Democratic party leaders were complicit with Republicans. As a result, a large turn-out election was overturned without any kind of formal process, and San Diegans were deprived of a full accounting of what really happened.
i couldn’t agree more. We have minority rule here in San Diego, where we’ve always been ahead of the rest of the country in electing faces like Faulconer’s — Pete Wilson, Jarry Sanders, Golding, the nameless Judge who couldn’t tell the truth — all of whom took orders from an invisible government. In our local case, that would be hoteliers, District Attorneys and law enforcement and, of course, land developers. Nationally, since Nxon, the executives have served the political class, banks and large financial institutions.
Filner deserved what he got. He was unfit for the office.
Will Trump get what he deserves? Money is what keeps Trump’s balloon inflated. Filner didn’t get along with the financial class, so his abusive behavior was enough to bring him down. Trump doesn’t suffer the limits imposed by common decency; he’s a Republican.