It’s a sad day in America. The US Navy launched the first carrier-based drone off its deck the other day, off the coast of Virginia. It’s an even sadder day for us in San Diego, as the drone was manufactured – in part, at least – by plants and engineers right here in our own city.
The launching of the drone off that deck demonstrates clearly that as drones become more and more integrated into becoming the armament of the nation’s military, they are becoming more and more accepted – here domestically, back in the good ol’ US of A.
And as drones become more and more prevalently utilized, not just by our armed forces overseas, but by law enforcement, border patrol, and local police departments here within our very own borders, American citizens are more and more subjected to a high-tech surveillance that is quite unlike anything we’ve known in the past – a surveillance that is becoming so pervasive, that it challenges our basic civil rights, freedoms and privacies.
The launch off the carrier the other day was just one step. But it is another one in the dangerous fast-paced race to perhaps make this society more watched and surveilled than any other in human history. The drones represent another notch in this technologically-based arching towards the authoritarian state, a trend that has been going on for decades, and continues whether there’s a Republican or Democratic administration.
Civil libertarians have long bemoaned the fate of this modern and mounting technologically-run and managed society, where ordinary citizens become less and less involved in government, and become mere objects to watch.
This surveillance that is fast becoming the norm, is not only in the skies, of course, but is all around us. Just earlier this year, a high-tech surveillance camera with 360 capability was installed on the end of the Ocean Beach Pier for the first time in history. The surveillance cameras these days are everywhere we go, along freeways, streets, corners downtown, office buildings, banks, offices, schools, government buildings, courts, parks, playgrounds, … the list just continues to grow. And as with more and more surveillance cameras everything, the advent of the world of the drones – which this launch helps to signify – is a world where American citizens will quickly watch our privacy and civil rights vanish.
My partner and I recently watched “The Company You Keep” with Robert Redford. As Redford’s character – a now-aged former Weather Underground militant of the anti-Vietnam war days – was trying to hide in the woods while evading the approaching authorities, my partner turned to me, and whispered, ” is this where the drone gets him?”
So, not only is this recent launch of the drone an event of historic proportions for the military and our defense system, it’s also significant in the fact that our government continues to have these drones manufactured and tested for more and more tasks that can outlast the endurance of human pilots and law enforcement agents.
So, it is a sad day in America to watch this drone that our fellow San Diegans helped design and build that was so proudly launched off a carrier.
Somebody has to say it, as the mainstream press is all trumpets.
The U-T San Diego on Wednesday’s frontpage:
The Navy launched a prototype unmanned plane off a U.S. aircraft carrier Tuesday, a significant milestone on the road to drones taking a place at the heart of naval aviation.
The Northrop Grumman X-47B batwing craft was launched by catapult from the deck of the carrier George H.W. Bush off the coast of Virginia.
In comparison, the Los Angeles Times (which, for some reason placed its article on the front page of its Business section) called the drone launch a “tech milestone” and “aviation history”.
Both papers quoted the head of Naval Air Forces, Vice Adm. David Buss – based here in Coronado – as comparing the drone’s launch in importance to the very first landing of a plane on the deck of a ship over one hundred years ago – in 1911:
“Today we saw a small, but significant pixel in the future picture of our Navy as we begin integration of unmanned systems into arguably the most complex war-fighting environment that exists today: the flight deck of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier”
Continuing to gush, the U-T excitedly proclaims that “the era of unmanned drones on aircraft carriers is coming this decade.” It quickly notes that the Navy will issue a call for proposals very soon for the next phase of the development of the drones, and of course, we can expect our own defense contractor – Northrop Grumman – will compete and go after the contract.
The complex drone launched on Tuesday was titled the X-47B, and some of its complexities were the result of San Diego engineers and workers. San Diego has become one of the nation’s centers for drone building and the jobs they bring. And our City also was the target of last month’s nation-wide protests against drones and their manufacture.
San Diego’s Rancho Bernardo houses half of the X-47B team of Northrop Grumman’s. The U-T reported that:
“About 100 employees at the defense contractor’s Rancho Bernardo campus work on vehicle design, software development and navigation.”
Northrop produces other drones – the Global Hawk and the Fire Scout drones. Plus General Atomics Aeronautical Systems up in Poway makes the Predator. This is what makes our region crucial to the future of unmanned vehicles in the sky. A Northrop vice president and its X-47B program manager in San Diego, Carl Johnson, stated:
“We are delighted to help launch this new era of naval capability.”
You bet they are. They got the contract for the drone-off-carrier in 2007. And the Navy has spent $1.4 Billion of our money on the program. Johnson also embellished the moment, when he compared the drone launch to”the Navy’s first catapult of a manned aircraft, which occurred in November 1915 ….”
The LA Times further analyzed the moment:
“The X-47B’s technology could mark a paradigm shift in warfare because the drone is capable of autonomous flight.”
Unlike other “combat” armed drones which are remotely controlled by humans on the ground, “the X-47B is designed to carry out a combat mission controlled entirely by a computer.” Sounds very reassuring, yes?
This proud baby of Northrop looks like a miniature B-2 stealth bomber, with a 52 foot wing span. It can reach 40,000 feet and has a range of 2400 miles, and able to get to subsonic speeds. It also can hold 4500 pounds of weapons or bombs.
Is this our future? Is this the future of our military? Of our domestic police no matter what color of state?
But what about all those San Diego jobs? you ask. San Diego has been a center of war plane, rockets and space vehicle manufacturing since World War II, so, allow it to become the national center for drone manufacture, you say.
Yet, what if all those working San Diegans at the drone plants were making nuclear bombs. Would you care as much about those jobs? Doesn’t it matter what we produce?
Can we really afford to sell San Diego’s soul for drones?
When the drone was launched off that carrier deck the other day, its design was so startling, the LA Times reports, that passing motorists on the local highway were so freaked out, they thought it was a UFO.
If it only was.
To me, warfare by remote/mouse is just the latest step in our long march toward unsupervised and unaccountable warfare. It probably started when someone (someone!) decided Congress no longer needed to issue declarations of war; the President could by himself. Was that Korea? The war we called The Korean Conflict, back when newspapers and the post-war world could still sniff murderous fraud and tried to cover it with that Orwellian word, “conflict.” Since Korea, we have fought no wars, we’ve just engaged in “conflicts.” No one voted to kill Guatemalans and Vietnamese. Someone (someone!) just wanted to do it. So, we did it.
Is this the drone that Ron Roberts is trying to buy or leasing to spot fires in the back country?
Members of San Diego Chapter 91 of Veterans for Peace have been demonstrating across the street from General Atomics, manufacturer of killer drones, weekly for about eight months. Our purpose has been and continues to be to increase public awareness of the threats to humanity and world peace manifested in this technology.
Judging from the microcosm of public opinion as represented by the responses from drivers passing by the intersection where we’ve positioned ourselves, we are encouraged to see a growing number of positive feedbacks in gestures and auto horns, and the sense we get that the public is waking up to this problem. We will not let up in this effort … it is too important and will not take too long to become too late.
Stan Levin, member VFP