By Doug Porter
There are new developments in the storyline about a ex-policy aide who claims congressional candidate Carl DeMaio sexually harassed him.
The ultra-conservative Washington Examiner has posted a story referring to internal DeMaio campaign emails show accuser Todd Bosnich remaining in a high level position following disclosure of the plagiarism scandal for which he was supposedly fired.
UT-San Diego and 10News released the results yesterday of a SurveyUSA poll in the wake of disclosure of the sexual harassment allegations that seems to indicate voters haven’t decided what to think about the scandal. Digging down into the polling data, there are indications suggesting independent voters are reacting negatively.
Drip, Drip, Drip…
As with any good scandal, bits and pieces of information continue to appear in the press.
A Washington Examiner story shows the DeMaio campaign continuing to assign accuser Todd Bosnich tasks expected of a higher level staff member.
The scandal began on May 12, when National Journal reported that a DeMaio campaign report on pensions plagiarized one of its articles. In the initial report, DeMaio apologized and took full responsibility for the lapse.
“I don’t throw my staff under the bus,” he told the magazine.
For the next several days, it appears the campaign did not take any action against Bosnich and continued assigning him long-term projects.
In a May 15 email to top campaign staffers and consultant Richard Grenell, DeMaio listed assignments for Bosnich, including developing major new policies and doing opposition research on Democratic candidate Scott Peters.
Bosnich’s assignments include “draft infrastructure plan,” “finalizing schedule for infrastructure press conference,” “start working on Economic Plan/Pathway to Prosperity,” “finish tally (and documentation) on all $ given by unions to Scott Peters (direct and IE),” “finish tally (and documentation) on all PAC money to SP” and “track peters.”
The email is similar to others sent to staffers during the campaign.
An earlier email cited in the story “similarly lists as an assignment for “Ric” — presumably Grenell — “LA Times bullshit spin” and “keep pushing LGBT responses to haters.”
Deny, Deny, Deny…
Candidate DeMaio continues to claim the sexual harassment allegations are a lie. He taped an interview with NBC7’s Rory Devine on Wednesday.
At a candidate forum on Tuesday at the Bernardo Heights Country Club, sponsored by the Conservative Order of Good Government, DeMaio spoke out.
From UT-San Diego:
“It’s an outrageous lie,” he said when asked about the subject by the forum moderator, who described the subject as “the elephant in the room.”
“There’s not a shred of truth, and it’s unfortunate in the last 20 days of a campaign that smears come up,” DeMaio said. “I think San Diegans are disgusted by this sort of politicizing of our election.”
He went on to blame Democrats for pushing the recent allegation.
While it’s certainly true that local Democrats (the national party types have issued a press release or two, which have gotten exactly zero traction) are not crying into their craft beers over the DeMaio scandal, the reality of this kind of scandal is its hard for many partisans to know how to react.
The prospect of a gleeful response (even in private) is tempered by the memory of the downfall of the ex-Mayor who now gets blamed for everything.
John R. Lamb, who pens the Spin Cycle column for City Beat, discussed this unease in week’s edition:
The back-and-forth set social media ablaze—not surprising, given the timing of the bombshell as ballots began dropping in voter mailboxes. The culmination may have come when former 52nd Congressional District candidate Lori Saldaña—neither a fan of incumbent Rep. Scott Peters nor the leadership of the local Democratic Party—equated to McCarthyism CityBeat’s decision to publish an interview with Bosnich by KFMB radio personality Mike Slater that was recorded the day before the June primary but was never aired.
The Peters campaign, meanwhile, has been quiet as a church mouse on the subject, most likely following the axiom that when a political opponent is falling, let him fall on his or her own. When the opposition is debating who has the more credible lie-detector results, what can one really add to the conversation?
The real question is: How will these allegations play among voters? Clearly, those who’ve always found DeMaio to be a self-serving, egomaniacal charlatan—a “political sociopath,” as former City Council colleague Donna Frye once labeled him—will feel further emboldened that San Diego will face another Bob Filner Moment with DeMaio in office.
(For the record, I read some of the Saldaña twitter storm and don’t remember the reference to McCarthy. But she was really passionate.)
I think City Beat was correct in posting the infamous interview with ex-staffer Todd Bosnich. The story was out there. He comes across as credible.
There was one part of the interview/story that deserves followup. Surely somebody can find his mother.
From the 10News coverage of the Bosnich interview, which started off with Police Chief Shelley Zimmerman, walking away from questions about the DeMaio claim she’d called him personally to announce he’d been cleared:
Then on May 18, Bosnich said he told DeMaio in a meeting to either quit the race or stop the behavior. The next day, Bosnich claims he was offered a $50,000 non-disclosure agreement from campaign manager Tommy Knepper, along with a new job with the San Diego County Republican Party.
“Frankly, the money, I found the most offensive thing of it,” Bosnich said. “That it treated me – I don’t know if I can say this – like a whore.”
That’s when he said the threatening email and phone calls started. Bosnich said he and his mother were threatened from anonymous email accounts, and he believes it’s because he wouldn’t sign the non-disclosure. Bosnich said the threats were either from DeMaio or someone in the campaign.
“I’ve never been so angry in all my life. You can take me on all you want, but leave my mom out of it,” he said.
Voter Reaction: Meh
One voter who lives in the 52nd Congressional District told me she’d received more than a half dozen phone calls last week asking for opinions on the accusations against DeMaio.
One of those calls was likely from SurveyUSA, and sponsored by 10News/UT-San Diego. They talked to 900 adults in the district; 517 of them said they were following news stories about the allegations.
Here are some results, via KPBS:
- The first question: “Is your opinion of Carl DeMaio favorable, unfavorable, neutral? Or do you have no opinion one way or another?”
- The response: 34 percent favorable; 38 percent unfavorable; and 21 percent neutral.
- The second question: “Have you been following recent news about a former DeMaio campaign aide?”
- The response: 57 percent yes; 38 percent no; and 4 percent not sure.
- The third question: “Do you believe the aide’s story?”
- The response: 36 percent yes; 41 percent no; and 22 percent not sure.
- The fourth question: “Does the story make your opinion of DeMaio more positive, more negative, or does it make no difference either way?”
- The response: 15 percent more positive; 35 percent more negative; and 49 percent no difference.
If you dig down into the data, I found the reactions of political independents of interest. The answers provided by the non-affiliated were all just a few points worse (from the DeMaio campaign’s point of view) that the general average.
“I Will Not Lose My Humanity”

Escondido Councilwoman Olga Diaz
The Escondido City Council met once again last night and denied an appeal by the ACLU supporting a proposed undocumented immigrant children shelter.
Some residents opposed opening the shelter, giving a litany of excuses, all of which have been refuted. And none of them had anything to do with the real reason: Brown people were coming.
From NBC7 News:
“The federal government pays all of the costs. There are no indirect costs. Children do not enroll in local schools, all medical care and all necessary services are paid for under the federal contract,” said David Loy, the ACLU’s San Diego legal director.
He said there is more than enough parking at the facility and there is no evidence of noise and traffic issues, calling the concerns “red herrings….”
And this quote:
“We refuse to give in or bend to the government at any level of the body politic throughout America,” said one speaker. “If I have it my way, I will deport each and every one of them and not even bat an eye if they are babies or toddlers or old men or women.”
The vote was 4-1 to kill the project. Mayoral candidate Olga Diaz’ reaction has been picked up nationally in various news accounts.
From UT-San Diego:
Councilwoman Olga Diaz, who is engaged in the final weeks of a yearlong campaign against Abed to become the city’s next mayor, voted in favor of the project.
She said her analysis of the land-use criteria found the shelter was appropriate for the location. She also said she supported the shelter because it would help children in need.
“I may lose an election, but I will not lose my humanity,” she said.
On This Day: 1859 – Abolitionist John Brown leads 18 men, including five free blacks, in an attack on the Harper’s Ferry ammunition depot, the beginning of guerrilla warfare against slavery 1916 – Margaret Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in New York City. 1966 – Joan Baez and 123 other anti-draft demonstrators were arrested for blocking the entrance to the Armed Forces Induction Center in Oakland, CA.
Did you enjoy this article? Subscribe to “The Starting Line” and get an email every time a new article in this series is posted!
I read the Daily Fishwrap(s) so you don’t have to… Catch “the Starting Line” Monday thru Friday right here at San Diego Free Press (dot) org. Send your hate mail and ideas to DougPorter@
My “McCarthyism” quote was actually based on the testimony of Joseph Welch, a well respected attorney who appeared before the commission.
Here’s a summary of the exchange that took place at his hearing, oddly enough, almost exactly 70 years ago from the date of this recent allegation:
“In the spring of 1954, McCarthy picked a fight with the U.S. Army, charging lax security at a top-secret army facility. The army responded that the senator had sought preferential treatment for a recently drafted subcommittee aide. Amidst this controversy, McCarthy temporarily stepped down as chairman for the duration of the three-month nationally televised spectacle known to history as the Army-McCarthy hearings.
“The army hired Boston lawyer Joseph Welch to make its case. At a session on June 9, 1954, McCarthy charged that one of Welch’s attorneys had ties to a Communist organization. As an amazed television audience looked on, Welch responded with the immortal lines that ultimately ended McCarthy’s career: “Until this moment, Senator, I think I never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness.” When McCarthy tried to continue his attack, Welch angrily interrupted, “Let us not assassinate this lad further, senator. You have done enough. Have you no sense of decency?”
The tweet the essay is likely referring to is my reply to another person on Twitter. He was finding the series of tweets between me and CityBeats staff of interest, and commented as such.
I replied with a screen capture of this famous “no sense of decency” quote.
Source of prior quote: US Senate archives here
I couldn’t agree more with the McCarthy comparison. Saying the victim was “obsessed and fancied himself as a future boyfriend,” that he was fired before he was fired and for something his boss did, and that he is a suspect in a criminal break-in, is just an intolerable smear campaign.
I mean, we are talking about the treatment of Bosnich here, aren’t we?
Take your pick. Plenty of smearing/character assassination to go around. It’s all a bit confusing.
And since mud splatters indiscriminately, it will likely depress voter turnout for both candidates.
Besides the troubling implication of moral equivalency, suppose that Bosnich’s accusations are true. Isn’t it important for voters to know about behavior that speaks directly to a candidate’s character?
This isn’t about DeMaio’s private beliefs, real or imagined, communist or Pastafarian. It’s about what may be genuine revelations of his personal conduct, how he has reacted to them, and whether there has been collusion in protecting him from them by the chief of police and the district attorney. And best as anyone can tell, none of it is connected to his opponent and his allies. The claims of character assassination look less like murder and more like suicide.
While I definitely agree that our elections should be about policies and not about personalities, sometimes you get a candidate who doesn’t give you that choice. And if you draw the conclusion that the process should be protected from certain kinds of discussion, you’ve traded the mess of democracy for the politesse of paternalism.
DeMaio vs. Peters is the most fascinating negative I can think of. Two unattractives, one of them spectacularly so, dumping $$,000,000 into Big Media troughs telling us nothing but screaming it. Can anyone tell us what Peters believes about federally funded affordable housing? Does DeMaio believe in public education? Why do we have to search for what either of them thinks about Iraq/Syria?
They’ve been running for office by trashing each other, as if they’re demonstrating leadership. In school, they’d be sent to the principal’s office.
Democracy is certainly messy, but the messiness shouldn’t be a goal of political campaigns. It looks like both are trying to turn off the vote. I say let them have their way. The people supplying the cash to both of them have probably already made a deal.
thank you – I agree completely Bob. I had started writing about this before the latest scandal(s) broke, and may still submit Information to Doug for consideration.
Basically: what about the voters and our interests, needs, backgrounds, etc? All the mud is obscuring our views of other imortant things.
Here’s a summary of key points in the 52nd- where I’ve lived, worked, studied and represented people:
DEMOGRAPHICS: The 52nd is a somewhat ethnically diverse group, per the 2010 Census. We are: Latin@ 13%; Asian 18%; Black 3%; White (non-Hispanic) 62%.
Therefore: “immigration reform” is treated by both men (from decidedly non-immigrant backgrounds) as a delicate flower, a sensitive subject worthy of reasoned, restrained discussion of a need to “improve” and “reform.” Immigrants in the 52nd are the small business/engineer/chemist/educated type, so we will not hear “Close the borders” diatribes; substitute: “strengthen the border.”
PARTY REGISTRATION: We are a politically diverse district, which means we can be challenging for insitutional political parties to motivate. The 52nd’s registered party affiliation is an almost equal balance of Democrat, Republican, and the fast growing “No Party Preference.” (Dem 32%; Rep 34%; NPP 29% Total Voters 385,540)
For more on this NPP paradox, see:
EDUCATIONAL LEVEL: We are a highly educated district. (I believe this NPP choice is related to that.)
According to the last census, 55% of us have bachelor degrees or higher.
HOW WE VOTE: We prefer to vote with postage stamps instead of at a Poll booth. (Nearly 10% of us have already voted as of Oct 17.) Permanent vote-by-mail ballots account for 55% of our electorate. This means the candidates knew where to find us this week: filling out our ballots.
Before these are returned, beware the mailbox between now and a week before Election Day. It will be stuffed with attack ads. Keep your recycling bin nearby.
A Congressional district like the 52nd, affluent and educated, gets a clown show for a campaign. Where we going?
Welcome to midterm elections. Political parties are always fighting the last war.
After the tea party revolts that succeeded in turning the House in 2010 Dems are taking no chances. They are counting on painting DeMaio with the tea party brush but apparently that wasn’t working. So bring out the veiled homophobic references to sex-related misbehavior.
Related: The UT has this out today: http://m.utsandiego.com/news/2014/oct/19/peters-demaio-congress-election-52nd-district/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter