By Doug Porter
There’s a special meeting of the Uptown Planners next Tuesday (March 24) to discuss overriding the SANDAG Regional Bike Plan in Mission Hills and Hillcrest. Cycling advocates are expected to face off against various organizations and people opposed to proposed traffic changes in the area.
This meeting is, I think, symbolic of a larger battle going on over the future of transportation in the city. While all the organizations involved give lip service to the Climate Action Plan’s goal of 18% bike mode share in Uptown by 2035, there are individuals who come across as negative about actually doing anything to achieve the goal.
Despite a growing body of evidence contradicting what some small business people assume about the negative impact of bike lanes, parking spaces and traffic calming measures, when it gets down to an actual plan, all they can say is “no.” (Kinda like the GOP on their alternative to Obamacare, I think.)
Although there is a bewildering array of claims and counterclaims about proposed bike corridors, there been years of community input meetings by SANDAG. That apparently isn’t enough.
From the SD Urban blog:
The problem is that two years in, they still haven’t provided an alternative plan – and “no bike lanes anywhere” isn’t a remotely valid option for a bike corridor after decades of neglecting people on bikes…
…Uptown Planners Chair Leo Wilson also claims that SANDAG has not listened to residents. Yet I’m told Wilson and others with his Metro CDC organization walked out of a SANDAG outreach meeting early on, saying, “we’ll see you in court”. When powerful people don’t get their way, that’s what happens.
The Hillcrest Business Association has provided matching funding with Bread & Cie and Crest Cafe to come up with $20,000 to hire California Strategies, employers of former Faulconer aide James Lawson, to lobby against plans to close the Washington Street off-ramp to University Ave. to automobiles.
More Lanes = Less Pollution?
The Bankers Hill / Park West Community Association (BHPWCA) has filed suit against the city of San Diego for a bike lane-extension project that removed one lane of traffic along Fifth Avenue. They’re playing the CEQA card, saying elimination of one lane creates a “strong possibility” that traffic will be diverted onto adjacent residential streets and creates a “foreseeable adverse traffic and public safety impact.”
Here’s another excerpt from SD Urban, speaking to Facebook conversations about the Fifth Avenue bike lanes:
Uptown Planner Jim Mellos, who’s the attorney suing the city to remove bike lanes on 4th and 5th Avenues (and the only dissenting vote on supporting the city’s Climate Action Plan), responded later in the thread that there will be many lawsuits to prevent bike lanes in Uptown…
…Mellos says, “You have some very powerful people in that area”. And that’s the theme of this post – powerful people have decided that streets can’t be safe for people on bikes and pedestrians, because they’ve declared ownership of the roads. No matter that you pay sales taxes to SANDAG for these projects just as they do. Mellos also told people on bikes in 2013 that if they want to ride a bike, they should move to New York City, because “this is San Diego, we drive here”.
To be fair, some on Facebook claim Mellos was talking about cycling advocates as the very powerful people. I haven’t seen the cyclists coming up with $10,000 chunks of money, so I doubt that’s the case.
What is clear to me–and I am not a cyclist–is that our (or our children’s) future depends on lessening dependence on cars. In order for that to happen, we have to build the kind of infrastructure making other ways of getting around easier.
The one option the opponents of bike routes seem to have settled on is preserving an unsustainable status quo. (That’s what “more study” really means.) It’s a battle we’re likely to see throughout the region in coming years.
Now if we could just get SANDAG to prioritize non-auto transportation in the near future throughout San Diego….
Mexican Farm Workers Strike
Not far south of San Diego, there’s a historic labor action in progress. Agricultural workers in Mexico’s San Quintin region led by a loose alliance of indigenous groups called the Alliance of National, State and Municipal Organizations for Social Justice have walked off the job and disrupted traffic on major commercial corridors.
Local officials are concerned about hundreds of produce trucks that could be blocked from reaching export markets. The region is major producer of strawberries, tomatoes and cucumbers. As this Los Angeles Times series from 2014 documented, pay and working conditions are simply awful.
From the Los Angeles Times reporting this week:
Wednesday morning authorities said they had reopened the Transpeninsular Highway after dispersing crowds and arresting dozens of protesters, but the situation remained tense with hundreds of police and Army soldiers descending on the region bracing for more protests.
The laborers are demanding higher wages and government-required benefits that they say have been denied to them for years. They are targeting about a dozen agribusinesses that supply major U.S. retail and restaurant chains.
Government and business officials, they say, have refused to address their concerns. “Nothing is resolved, and now things are getting hot,” said Faustino Hernandez, a farmworker from San Quintin.
Civic San Diego #Fail
In a nutshell @CivicSanDiego‘s commitment to transparency & public input #BuildwithBenefits #CommunityBudgetAlliance pic.twitter.com/V3K3FOWdgm
— Kyra Greene, PhD (@kgreeneCPI) March 20, 2015
On This Day: 1865 – Michigan authorizes formation of workers’ cooperatives. Thirteen were formed in the state over a 25-year period. Labor reform organizations were advocating “cooperation” over “competitive” capitalism following the Civil War and several thousand cooperatives opened for business across the country during this era. 1965 – President Lyndon B. Johnson orders 4,000 troops to protect the Selma-Montgomery civil rights marchers. 1987 – The Food and Drug Administration approved AZT. The drug was proven to slow the progress of AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome).
Did you enjoy this article? Subscribe to “The Starting Line” and get an email every time a new article in this series is posted!
I read the Daily Fishwrap(s) so you don’t have to… Catch “the Starting Line” Monday thru Friday right here at San Diego Free Press (dot) org. Send your hate mail and ideas to DougPorter@SanDiegoFreePress.Org Check us out on Facebook and Twitter.
Thank you for highlighting the upcoming meeting on the SANDAG bike plan. As you note, the Climate Action Plan (or really any meaningful efforts to enhance our public health) has to include a significant reduction in our reliance on automobiles.
Selling the public on ANY limitation on automobile circulation is a tough sell. Back in the day, when the San Diego Trolley was first proposed I can remember covering a Council hearing at which more than a few gasoholics were waving protest signs. At least two turned red at the microphone and shook their fists. And this was only a proposal to offer an alternative to the car, not a substitute, one that would only slightly
impede circulation at a very few mandatory crossings.
I do believe the automobile is a caste symbol. If you can’t own a home, chances are you can afford (barely) a car, and anything that threatens the car threatens freedom, loyalty to (oil?), manhood, womanhood and apple pie.
Trolley line extensions should also be on the table. Restoring the line up Park Avenue to University City would be a good one since it would eliminate a lot of zoo and Balboa Park traffic.
Amen to this. On any cheery Saturday Park Blvd. is a string of cars lined up at the lights. Neighbourhood parking spots disappear at 11:30 am, so if you have to make a run for a bottle of milk or can of beans you won’t be able to return until 4 pm. Not to mention the Zoo Parking Lot which is a vast asphalt plain covered by cars releasing their engine heat. There is no natural place on earth like it.
But with all car drivers suffering from TransitPhobia the only way it would gain public favour would be if the Chargers won the rights to a new stadium in Florida Canyon… oh shit, maybe the firm of Sanders and Spanos heard that.
I live on Park Blvd and deal with the traffic often. So yeah putting a trolley line there would be great but the questions is, would enough people actually use it to make any difference? Also what do you mean by restoring? Did there used to be a line there?
San Diego/dag should change the name of The Trolley , which is so old fashioned, to The Rail, which is cool, and also the name of an very endangered local (so cal) bird species in our mission bay marsh, the light footed ridgeway clapper rail, (something like a marsh chicken) which we could adopt as the poster child/bird for an Environment San Diego (EnviSD) development of an globally admirable commuter rail system, and donate a portion of the branding to restoring local wetlands… That would be my idea.
For bike routes I would say, BICYCLISTS! BIKE the ROUTES That YOU See Fit…You Rule!