Who Are the Democrats Who Aren’t Really Democrats?
By Doug Porter
This started out to be a column addressing the increasing awareness of the Bernie movement on finding like-minded progressive candidates on the ballot. It ended up be an exploration of the Dark Side of both local politics and the newly ascendant supporters of the Democratic Socialist from Vermont.
For those of interested in short lists for city offices, here it is: if you like Bernie, then Lori Saldaña for Mayor, Bryan Pease for City Attorney, Sara Saez for D9 City Council, and Jose Caballero for D7 City Council…
…Except that the Progressive Democratic Club says if you support Bernie you should vote for Ed Harris for Mayor.
Later this week, the San Diego Free Press will publish the Progressive Voter Guide, which will include endorsements. In the meantime, you can view all our articles on the upcoming primary by clicking here.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, things are getting ugly. Real ugly. There are RINOs, DINOs, and mud being slung everywhere.
RINO Supports DINO
Republican Mayor Kevin Faulconer is reportedly endorsing Democrat Anthony Bernal in the District 3 city council race. If you add in the campaign contributions from Papa Doug Manchester along with indirect support from reactionary business groups, it’s near impossible to deny Democratic leader Jess Durfee’s assertion that Bernal is a stalking horse for Republicans.
KPBS and others have run stories emphasizing how Bernal and opponent Chris Ward have few distinctions between where they stand on issues. Sometimes you have to look beyond what candidates say towards who’s picking up the tab.
In Bernal’s case, the distinctions are obvious, especially the $20,000 ‘Independent Expenditure’ bump via the Builders Assn PAC. (See Republicans Look to San Diego for the Best Government Money Can Buy for other fundraising totals.)
And that sucking noise you hear is Faulconer’s campaign hosing up all the money it can from local (and mostly conservative) sources.
The incumbent mayor’s campaign is also drawing support from around the country, as Matt Potter at the Reader is reporting on donations to Communities United for Tomorrow’s Economy Supporting the Re-election of Mayor, an “independent expenditure PAC operated by the Chamber of Commerce and the Lincoln Club.
He says money’s flowing to the PAC via Community Leaders of America, a Virginia political nonprofit. Funders for that outfit include the American Petroleum Institute, WalMart, tobacco companies R.J. Reynolds and Altria, along with trash haulers Waste Management and Republic Services.
Mud Flies in D5 (And D1. And D9)
Over in District 5, Democrat Frank Tsimboukakis is tweeting up a storm about endorsements he says incumbent Mark Kersey doesn’t actually have. So far he’s called out non-endorsements from SD Fire Local 145 and the Police Officers Association.
Unfortunately, Tsimboukis needs some coaching on social norms and social media, as this post over at conservative site SDRostra indicates:
Four years ago, District 1 Republican candidate Ray Ellis got called out by then-incumbent Sheri Lightner for fabricated allegations she’s handed out $28 million in bonuses to city employees.
Now he’s at it again in the contest against Democrat Barbara Bry, via mailers from the Lincoln Club PAC decrying her as a toady for the San Diego Chargers in their quest for a publicly financed stadium.
Ellis should consider going in the carpet business after this campaign. He does a good impression of lying like a rug.
In District 9, Sarah Saez is doing her best to draw attention to all the conservative money flowing into the campaign of Ricardo Flores. From Facebook:
So strange what San Diego considers an acceptable Democrat. Proud to say that the Lincoln Club would never think to give me money and if they did I would never take it. My opponent Ricardo Flores, not so much. In fact David Malcolm, chair of the Lincoln Club’s political committee, maxed out on him. Good luck to anyone in the Democratic party or in Labor who’s supporting him. He’s got people with way more money that he’ll owe favors to if he gets elected who don’t care about our values, including workers. STOP ELECTING BAD POLITICIANS!
Pay attention to the part about that guy Malcolm; you’re about to meet him again…
Historic Factions Vie for Party Control
Competing groups are battling it out for seats representing the 80th Assembly District on the San Diego County Democratic Party Central Committee. The campaign for a slate headed by City Councilman David Alvarez is being financed — through Suncoast Financial Mortgage —by David Malcolm, chairman of the Lincoln Club’s Political Affairs Committee.
Lincoln Club anti-Democratic candidate mailer
The Lincoln Club supported mailings in the 2014 mayoral contest making Alvarez appear as though he was a gang member. Malcolm told the Voice of San Diego he was now supporting the Alvarez slate because “it’s the business community’s responsibility to support people like Alvarez when they show independence from organized labor.”
Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, along with the Labor Council’s Mickey Kasparian, is supporting another slate. Kasparian is steamed over what he sees as a Republican-funded effort at gaining influence within the party. (Malcolm says he’s left the GOP)
The Alvarez slate is campaigning as “We Say No to Trump.” Their opponents have packaged themselves as the “Working Families” slate.
But if you were to look at this strictly as a business vs. labor matter, you’d be ignoring some important local history.
From Voice of San Diego:
S
There has long been a striking political chasm between Democrats in the South Bay. Two networks of elected officials and party activists have constantly vied for power. Alvarez won the district and the Council seat when he beat Felipe Hueso, the brother of state Sen. Ben Hueso in 2010.
Lorena Gonzalez, who was at that time the head of the San Diego Imperial Counties Labor Council, supported Hueso. And now, the slate of candidates running for the Democratic Central Committee that Kasparian supports include people who have worked for Gonzalez…
…Alvarez’s slate includes several people who have worked for him, including his preferred successor for the City Council seat, Vivian Moreno. For Alvarez, it appears to be a strategic long-term move to perhaps help Moreno or his own chances should he seek elected office again after he is termed out in 2018.
So who are the progressives here? I’ll venture to say both sides would say they are. Democrats without Labor are like bread without yeast. Labor without Alvarez is an embarrassment, especially after they helped raise $4 million for his mayoral campaign.
The Democratic Central Committee is made up of six elected representatives from every Assembly district in San Diego, plus state –but not city– lawmakers.
The committee controls the money on behalf of endorsed candidates. No endorsement equals no money spent on the all-important ‘member communications’ being mailed just prior to elections.
In the case of this particular battle for representatives from the 80th, it’s my observation that the Central Committee’s failure to pick a candidate in the city attorney race is an underlying issue.
(Images for mailers were originally published at Voice of San Diego)
OMG OMG OMG #FeeltheStupid
Finally, after noticing various Bernie fans wondering about down ballot races, I had the unfortunate experience of spending some time on the San Diego for Bernie Sanders 2016 Working Group Facebook page.
With nearly 3500 followers, this Facebook page is one of the places to go to learn about the many events put on by the local Sanders campaign.
The last time I was visited (in March) involved following up on allegations on the Clinton campaign sending infiltrators into San Diego. Allegations against a local activist were easily disproven and eventually removed from the page.
Unfortunately, it’s also prone to lots of shared posts from (I assume) political newbies with (or without) tin foil hats.
Clickbait websites like SourcePlanet.Net, Aldipest.com, USAPoliticsNow.com are apparently trusted sources of information, even though none of them existed just six months ago. All have hidden ownership, less than 200 Facebook followers, and a buttload of headlines/stories often lifted from each other.
Breaking news topics include the absolute Facebook blackout of Bernie Sanders (debunked at Snopes) and near panicked (and bullshit) stories about a massive voter suppression campaign in California, going on RIGHT NOW.
Then there are the right-wing news sites reposted regularly there that somehow become credible when they recycle Hillary Clinton scandal stories. Today’s garbage haul includes a tirade about the H woman enabling child molesters and killers. (Sorry kids, no links for this crap)
Following a disastrous Democratic meeting in Nevada over the past weekend, there is a graphic being shared calling for people not to vote for Senator Barbara Boxer, who–get a clue–happens to be retiring and not on the ballot.
I know that running an insurgent campaign for office is really tough. Old ideas die hard, and nobody in their right mind surrenders power willingly. But folks, wake up! Leave the National Enquirer stuff to the Trump campaign.
Outside of B movies, no campaign has ever been won by “exposing plots.” Now get to work and win this one for Bernie Sanders!
PS–Yes, I know about all the bad things the Clinton campaign does or is alleged to do. I feel obligated to speak to people I generally agree with who should know better.
On This Day: 1938 – U.S. Supreme Court issues Mackay decision, which permits the permanent replacement of striking workers. The decision had little impact until Ronald Reagan’s replacement of striking air traffic controllers (PATCO) in 1981, a move that signaled anti-union private sector employers that it was OK to do likewise. 1980 – Dr. George C. Nichopoulos was indicted in Memphis on 14 counts of overprescribing drugs to Elvis Presley, Jerry Lee Lewis and nine other patients. 1988 – A report released by Surgeon General C. Everett Koop declared that nicotine was addictive in similar was as heroin and cocaine.
Did you enjoy this article? Subscribe to “The Starting Line” and get an email every time a new article in this series is posted!
I read the Daily Fishwrap(s) so you don’t have to… Catch “the Starting Line” Monday thru Friday right here at San Diego Free Press (dot) org. Send your hate mail and ideas to DougPorter@SanDiegoFreePress.Org Check us out on Facebook and Twitter.
Doug Porter
Latest posts by Doug Porter (see all)
- Last Call. Last Column. - December 14, 2018
- Which Presidential Candidate Will You Support in 2020? - December 13, 2018
- Mounting the Assault on Big Gay and Other Drivel From SDSU’s Minimum Wage Scrooge - December 12, 2018
Bryan Pease should absolutely NOT be the choice of Bernie supporters in San Diego. Bryan Pease’s ballot statement is dishonest and we can’t trust him. Bernie is honest, Bryan Pease is NOT! Vote for someone else!
Who do represent other than somebody who doesn’t like Pease? I went to Pro-Bernie sites around town and found no indication of what you are talking about. Furthermore, Pease has at least shown up at Bernie events. You can’t say that for any of the other candidates.
I don’t represent anybody but I won’t vote for a candidate who lies in his ballot statement. Neither would Bernie!
What’s the lie?
He lies about where he went to law school. Hint: it’s not Oxford!
Hmm, thanks for the hint, but is that the lie? Are you saying his ballot statement says he went to Oxford? I’ve haven’t seen the ballot statement.
But the education bit of his FB campaign page says,
“BS (Human Development, Nutrition), Cornell University, 2000
JD (law), SUNY Buffalo, 2004”
Is there a lie in there? Is there something different in his ballot statement?
He has a resume link at http://www.bryanpease.com, but the document appears to be unavailable. Maybe the lie was in there?
Thanks.
Aha, okay, I found his resume from a different link at his website. In there it includes that he was an “Associate law student” at Oxford in Spring 2004. But atop that entry is his law degree, the May 2004 JD from SUNY Buffalo.
So, no Oxford lie there, it seems, as his resume states a JD from Buffalo, while also showing he appears to have attended, or otherwise been formally associated with, Oxford in his last year of law school.
Are you saying that his ballot statement overstates his Oxford credential beyond “Associate law student”, in a way that implies, or could even be seen as intentionally misleading?
Can you cite the text here, so we can all see?
Thanks.
Bryan Pease is the only City Attorney candidate who is endorsing Bernie. His opponent Rafael is endorsing establishment Hilary. Great if you want more of the same. Bryan Pease is all about helping the people, not the big money.
Here’s what Bryan’s resume says:
EDUCATION
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO SCHOOL OF LAW
Dean’s scholarship
Juris Doctor, May 2004
OXFORD UNIVERSITY
Hertford College, Oxford, England
Associate law student, spring 2004
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
College of Human Ecology, Ithaca, NY
Dean’s list
Bachelor of Science in Human Development, May 2000
Here’s his ballot statement:
► Degree from Cornell University, studied law at Oxford University
So he left off where he got his law degree. THAT makes him a liar?
You need to get a life.
i can attest to the fact that Bryan studied law at Oxford. He and my daughter were dating at the time and they both studied in the UK.
It was admittedly a quick search but I couldn’t find anything on Pease’s website claiming an Oxford law degree. There was an item in the Sept. 03 2012 Oxford Times reporting the drunk driving conviction of a Bryan Pease in the Oxford Times of Sept. 03 2012. That was well after our much younger Bryan Pease came to town. The drunk was a 60-year-old who happens to share the name. You’ll find a bunch of Bryan Pease’s in Florida too, if you Google the name. I don’t know if they claim having gone to law school in Oxford, or being drunk. You might want to check into that. Here’s the clipping from The Oxford Times:
Bryan Pease, 60, of Sherwood Avenue, Abingdon, admitted drink driving in Vineyard, Abingdon, on May 9. Had 135 micrograms of alcohol in 100ml of breath, above the legal limit of 35 micrograms. Given a year’s supervision and 160 hours’ unpaid work. Also told to pay £35 costs and banned from driving for 40 months.
It is my understanding the San Diego Progressive Democratic Club was restricted in its bylaws from endorsing Lori Saldana who is not running as a Democrat. She is running as an Independent and she has received an acceptable rating from the SDPDC.
FYI: My Top Priorities as Mayor of San Diego
Many of these priorities will be based on legislative experience.
I authored and co-authored numerous bills, including a landmark Marriage Equality bill (co-authored on my first day in office), affordable housing, Climate Change and Energy Efficiency bills, gun safety (ending open carry) and public safety, and ensuring better access to education, healthcare and mental health counseling for veterans, military and low income families.
I earned awards from a variety of groups and organizations for my leadership on civil rights, women’s healthcare, increasing the minimum wage and countless other issues.
I will continue the work I began as a legislator to do more, including:
Use state & federal funds to develop more affordable housing
Preserve and renovate existing affordable housing before replacing it with new housing
Create a “housing first” policy for the city to get people out of homelessness and into a home.
Work with the County of San Diego to develop a plan to spend some of their nearly $180 million reserve intended to provide mental healthcare services to people in need.
Establish a Community Choice Aggregation program to provide clean, affordable and locally generated energy.
Improve public safety, and support law enforcement officers and dispatchers, using funding from federal grants and state programs.
Continue to partner with Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs to enact policies in support of active duty military members, veterans and their families.
Advocate for increased access to SNAP and other programs to support working families who are struggling with San Diego’s high costs and can’t afford basic necessities.
Hire additional urban foresters and arborists, to ensure current city trees are professionally maintained, and more are planted, as part of the Climate Action Plan
Review, update and fully fund implementation strategies for Climate Action Plan and Blue Water Reclamation project.
What are your priorities and suggestions for additional programs that need attention in San Diego?
I’m saving this on my desktop. I haven’t heard a local politician speak with this much clarity and intelligence since I came to San Diego 46 years ago.
Well, in fairness to Jon Burgh, that ballot statement, “Degree from Cornell University, studied law at Oxford University”, is at least objectively ambiguous, and, cynically, misleading.
Like you, I’m against objective ambiguity, objectively speaking, of course.
It’s not cynical to say that the meaning of the ballot statement as written is logically ambiguous, it is unclear what degree is from Cornell, or what is meant by “studied law” at Oxford. It could reasonably be interpreted to mean he earned a law degree at Oxford, or Cornell.
So, yes, I think it’s objectively ambiguous, that is, without suggesting it was written to be intentionally misleading, or a lie, even though it is objectively odd that Pease would leave out his law degree from SUNY Buffalo in an educational background bit on a formal statement.
For the first time, I am voting for an independent candidate, Lori Saldana, leaving the Democratic Party line because Lori has the experience and perspective for our city that I admire, and it is refreshing to see her back in action in her hometown. Cool on the coast… Big politics is an expensive circus, no wonder they call them “parties”…
Thanks for the frank chat about candidates on your free press
According to VoSD, Mr. Pease supports BOTH the Chargers stadium initiative AND the Briggs “Citizens Plan”. This alone makes him NOT the candidate for Sanders supporters to vote for.
Don’t be too hasty in judging Pease on the initiatives stuff. Yes, most of us don’t want any tax dollars to be used to build a stadium for the bolts. And I’m part of the minority saying that we don’t even need a larger convention center–perhaps we should be looking to relocate it before access by kayak is required, tho.
BUT… there are other issues at play, like the challenge to the hoteliers power in that both measures take control of the TOT away from their self-appointed tourism agency.
There isn’t anybody with the $$$ or the organization to put another initiative on the ballot. What we have here by proxy is a battle for the heart and soul of San Diego.
The City Council certainly doesn’t have the cojones to do this, and Bob Filner got slaughtered for even thinking about it.
Also, Lori Saldana–who many Sanders supporters are liking a lot–is in favor of the Citizen’s Plan (Briggs edition). Does that mean that Sanders supporters should vote for Kevin Faulconer, who right now is only covertly opposed to these initiatives?
The point is that this isn’t as simple as people are making it out to be.
The only solution to Darth ConVadium and San Diego’s baloney slicers is to vote against the bloat of both plans, that of Briggs/JMI Realty and of the Chargers and our bashful mayor. Just say no to both. There’s nothing in these scams that could possibly bring good things to San Diego. (Let free market capitalism put together Dallas West, it it’s so important to corporate welfare.)
“Who Are the Democrats Who Aren’t Really Democrats?”
the clinton’s.
no one family has done more damage to the average american, & for their own selfish gain.
unconscionable.
Vaya con Dios