Evidence of Big Money Guiding Council Decisions
By Richard Riehl / The Riehl World
Five candidates have declared their intention to challenge the two at-large incumbents in the Carlsbad city council election in November. If they want to bring real change, beyond the addition of new faces, to the city’s go-along-to-get-along political cronyism, they should also lobby for a new city ordinance to limit the amount and source of campaign donations from individuals, business interests, and special interest groups, beginning with the 2018 election.
That’s when the three other council members, who did the most damage to the council’s credibility in the last two years, will be up for reelection. There’s plenty of evidence big money, much of it from out of town, guides the decisions of these city leaders.
Mayor Matt Hall’s 2014 campaign collected $9,500 from five donors who ponied up at least $1,000, the largest a $5,000 donation from Jimmy Ukegawa, the owner of the strawberry fields and the one person, other than billionaire L.A. developer Rick Caruso, who had the most to gain from a shopping mall on the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Hall’s four other deep pocket donors were executives with connections to the city’s Grand Pacific Resort hotels.
Councilmember Michael Schumacher (no relation to city council candidate Cori Schumacher) was the King of Collections from high-roller donors to his 2014 campaign, amassing $23,760 in contributions of $1,000 or more from eleven donors.
Jimmy Ukegawa was his greatest benefactor at $4,260. Brian Rupp, the President of Shopoff Realty Investments, based in Irvine, California, kicked in another $2,650. That’s the firm with its eye on property east of Ponto Beach in south Carlsbad, where Rupp proposes to build 191 apartment and luxury townhomes, a public plaza, shops, and restaurants. Cameron Hulse, a Carlsbad orthodontist, added another $2,500 to Schumacher’s campaign war chest.
Schumacher’s eight other deep pocket donors included: Sharad Khandwala, the Solana Beach investor who brought the Holiday Inn and Staybridge Suites to Palomar Airport Road; the California Association of Realtors; and an assortment of other commercial real estate owners and managers of property throughout the city.
Councilmember Mark Packard received a total of $3,500 in donations of $1,000 or more from three individuals to his 2014 campaign. His largest was $1,500 from Sharad Khandwala (see above). The other two included a San Diego Commercial Real Estate Services firm and a San Diego General Building Contractor.
Carlsbad’s not alone in North San Diego County in attracting big money from out-of-towners. There’s no limit to campaign contributions in Oceanside, either. Jerry Kern, a candidate for re-election to the city Council in 2014, collected $5,000 from L.A.’s California Real Estate Political Action Committee and another $3,500 from the Building Industry Association of San Diego, among his supporters who gave $1,000 or more to his campaign.
Another Oceanside city council member, Gary Felien, got $5,000 from the California Real Estate PAC and another $5,000 from Ure Kretowics, a LaJolla real estate developer, for his 2014 re-election campaign.
Meanwhile, Carlsbad’s three neighboring cities to the south and east all have campaign contribution limits. Vista’s $440 limit applies to all contributors, whether they are a business, committee, group or individual. San Marcos and Encinitas limit campaign donors to no more than $250.
Kristin Gaspar’s 2014 Encinitas mayoral campaign raised about $30,000. I didn’t count the number of her donors, but the city’s $250 limit means she had to have at least 120 to produce that amount of money. It took the Carlsbad Three a mere 18 donations to raise almost $37,000.
To Carlsbad’s credit, its website is the most accessible and transparent of any other North County city to campaign donations and statements of economic interests of elected officials.
You can get there with only three clicks, beginning with the homepage tab labeled, “City Hall.” Click on “Open Government,” then “Disclosure and Ethics,” then choose from either “Statement of Economic Interests Filings” or “Campaign Financial Disclosure Statements” to examine official reports of a given public official or candidate.
The Carlsbad citizen activists who defeated a billionaire developer at the polls despite being outspent 100 to 1, should turn their attention now, not only to replacing the council’s old guard beginning in November but to reforming campaign financing that invites corruption.
They can begin today by lobbying for limits to the dollar amount allowed and source of support of the city’s political campaigns. Leaders who owe their success to big money from a few out of town interests can hardly be expected to act in the best interests of the majority of their constituents.
Latest posts by Richard Riehl (see all)
- Carlsbad’s Bogus State of the City Video - August 16, 2017
- Will District Elections Loosen the Grip of Carlsbad’s Old Guard? - August 7, 2017
- Carlsbad Mayor Matt Hall’s Profile in Cronyism: Formalizing Appointments to City Committees - June 14, 2017
Thanks for the information Richard. After attending council meetings in Carlsbad it was difficult to come away thinking the council cared what their citizens thought. Time and again citizens were treated like annoying children who were just getting in the way of their business. Not one of the council members spoke up against the old guard status quo that has been steering the community for forty years. That is to say if it has a dollar sign on it is okay with them. They proclaim the cities values while doing everything they can to make sure the small town feel and beach town atmosphere go up in smoke. Their motto should be keep Carlsbad for the wealthy. Wealth is fine as long as you have some balance and perspective. Some of my best friends are wealthy and they are shocked by the council’s behavior as well. Sad.
Mr. Riehl,
get real! You come here from some godforsaken place and then you start telling us, many whom have been here for a long time and for a good reason, to get rid of the “old guard status”! Stop and drop everything, because I am here now and I know best – NIMBY’s are so
predictable as well as arrogant.
censorship?
My wife and I arrived here from Indiana twenty years ago. Carlsbad homeowner the entire time, never been called a NIMBY. If you questioned something specific about the facts of my article, rather than engaging in name calling, I’d be happy to respond to your criticism.
Ruchard, I hope you are writings book about all this, and I hope it has a happy ending!
thanks for your good work in reporting. I’ll be anxious to listen to the platforms of the candidates as I don’t like what I see with the currant council. Hall is the most arrogant of them all.I’ve lived in Carlsbad since 2011 however, I was on the council in Solana Beach and quite often we were unanimous in our voting but we worked hard to reach consensus on many issues, IMO this council is not made up of independent thinkers.
Thank you for exposing what is really motivating our current council members $$$$. They wanted all this change and new development. New development brings in new voices who are not in step with the old guard. Their new development brought in people willing to challenge their disingenuous behavior.
I have to make on slight correction to Tere Renteria…this Mayor and City Council are NOT thinkers of any kind at all, be it independent or dependent. They are, to put it bluntly, not very intelligent. Add to that a near complete lack of ethics and integrity, and you have a recipe for a citizen revolt.