By Frank Gormlie / The OBRag
OB activists were facing this model of development for Ocean Beach’s waterfront back in 1971-71, as depicted straight out of the original Precise Plan.
Recently – within the context of discussions over the City of San Diego’s plans to bring massive redevelopment to the Midway District on this site – there has been some serious disparagement of the 30 foot height limit, and it’s being blamed for everything from the housing crisis to the lack of affordability at the coast.
So, apparently it’s time, once again, to present some local history – the origins of the 30 foot height limit – and some of the good folks who made it happen.
It all began back in the late 60s when beach residents began to rebel against a wave of unbridled development occurring at the coast. One of the first glimmers of grassroots activists was a group of Pacific Beach residents who around 1969 began a petition drive against a large building about to be constructed right on the water’s edge. The petition effort was unsuccessful as it was built and is known today as the Capri by the Sea.
Yet that first defeat motivated the newbies into continuing their efforts against projects on the beaches, bluffs and bay. They formed a group called Beach Action Group (BAG). They included people like Alex Leondis and his wife from PB, and people like Betty Bish and Mignon Scherer and her hubby from the OB and Point Loma area.

One of the original VOTE posters for Prop D
And it was the BAG activists who first came up with the idea of placing a height restriction on new construction along the coast on the ballot. Because the BAG activists had to go city-wide with their Prop D petition, they formed a new, less exclusive group, called VOTE – Voters Organized to Think Environment. Prop D called for a 30 foot height limit in the Coastal Zone – everything west of I-5, excluding parts of downtown San Diego (it was solely a City of San Diego proposition).
‘Why 30 feet? Why not 40 feet?’
VOTE had a dozen meetings or so back in 1970 and 1971 that included discussions and arguments about what kind of height limit they should go after. Most of them wanted to keep it fairly simple. They saw I-5 as a division between the east and the coastal zone. Their researchers got busy and identified the height limits across San Diego. They discovered that most – 80% in fact – of San Diego already had a 30 foot height limit. About 4% of the communities had 40 feet. So they went for 30.
They began their petition in 1970 – called Prop D – got it on the ballot and – long story short – it won in 1972. But the initiative was challenged by the building industry in the courts and it wasn’t finally implemented until 1976.
Of course, it’s in the details where the story gets interesting.
Due to city rules and the population size, the petition gatherers needed about 25,000 to 26,000 signatures of voters to place Prop D on the ballot. The public notice of the petition was published in the Daily Transcript May 14, 1971.
After months of signature gathering by unpaid volunteers, they obtained 36,000 – a number that forced the City Council to accept the initiative and have it included in an election.
Those active back then recall how the City Council delayed on acting on it for one year “to think about it”, but finally placed it on the November 7, 1972 ballot. VOTE members felt they only had one member on the Council who was sympathetic to Prop D -Floyd Morrow. The general attitude of the Council was ‘you have no business involving yourselves in our business.’
Yet, despite the governing elite’s attitude, the results from the November 1972 election were stunning – and overjoyed the original activists for it was a landslide. 64% of the city voters voted “yes” for Prop D. And it wasn’t just the coastal communities that voted for it – it was across the board – many neighborhoods went for it with the attitude, ‘it’s our beaches, too,’. Ocean Beach and Pacific Beach voted for it by 80%.

Alex Leondis, who was one of the main organizers in the effort to place the thirty-foot limit on coastal construction onto conservative San Diego’s ballot.
But, Prop D was immediately met with legal challenges.
Essentially, the construction industry felt threatened and it claimed it was not legal or constitutional as it represented a “taking” by the government without compensation. Placing any limits on their abilities to build whatever they wanted was perceived by large developers as illegal government intrusion into their god-given rights to make profits off the coast -a coast that belonged to everyone.
In January of 1973, the legal challenges to Prop D ended up in Judge Welch’s San Diego courtroom and he overruled it. But in November of that year, the Appellate Court reversed Welch, ruling that Prop D was indeed constitutional – that the California Constitution does allow citizens to create petitions, as they did in this case, and therefore, the result was legal.
That wasn’t the end of it. The construction industry took Prop D to the California Supreme Court, which upheld it, and then the developers took it to the US Supreme Court – which refused to hear it – this was in February 1976 – which meant that the lower court’s ruling stood. Prop D was finally resolved.
So, Prop D was overwhelmingly passed by the voters of San Diego in November 1972 – but it wasn’t until February 1976 that the voters’ will was finally enforced.

Mignon Scherer was best known locally as one of the main organizers in the effort to place the thirty-foot limit on coastal construction in San Diego. She passed on March 25, 2017 at the age of 92.
Meanwhile, developers were allowed to build during that period from 1973 to 1976 as the courts debated Prop D. If a developer’s project was already in the process, that is, if the developer had filed for a permit before November 1972 – when Prop D was on the ballot – then those projects were allowed to proceed, but after that date, they were subject to the new height limit.
Ocean Beach too – saw its first activism in the those early years of the 70s, the first beginnings of residents taking planning matters into their own hands, with the establishment of a group called the Ocean Beach Planning Organization. (OBPO was one of a several forerunners to today’s Ocean Beach Planning Board.)
This reaction to the blocking of coast views and space by builders also included petitions to establish the California Coastal Commission across the state.
Prop D represented part of a tidal wave of rebellion by the people of Southern California against unbridled development of the state’s beautiful coastline.
Much of this post was taken from a presentation by Alex Leondis in November 2012.
Anyone who thinks the massive developments planned across our region will solve the problem of affordable housing simply hasn’t been paying attention. There may be many good reasons for increasing density in urban areas, but affordable housing, in the minuscule numbers accounted for in these developments, is not one of those reasons. Overall, they will contribute a tiny fraction of dwellings needed by people with low to moderate incomes. What massively dense, tall developments promise is that they will give developers a break from providing the parking, green space and other necessities that allow tightly packed urbanites to live with each other without abundant hostility. Now we are seeing the possible demise of the 30-foot height limit. Perhaps the developers and politicians will say this is the only way we can provide affordable housing. Don’t believe it. Affordable housing will be available when we, the people, start to give a darn about whether our fellow citizens are housed. In the meantime, we will all be worse off by relying on the false promise that if we ease requirements for development in height, parking, green space, etc., we will be able to live successfully on top of each other, fighting for every parking space, driving to distant green spaces, and stretching our necks to get a clean breath of air. Existing neighborhoods and new residents will see every street filled with cars, increased numbers of accidents, greater safety concerns, and flaring tempers.
i always thought the limit should not have included that land where I-5 swings away from the coast. Midway, Loma Portal, the old aircraft factories and current SPAWAR structures — even the airport is included in the west-of-I-5 zone. now we find out the freeway was chosen simply for simplicity.
i think the limit should be kept west of the spine of Point Loma. those communities that cannot see the water anyway have little need for the limit on them. the neighborhood planning groups would decide the details.
i don’t think anyone wants to eliminate the 30-foot height limit completely. but the Midway area — and especially the Sports Arena — could really use some GOOD development without an an arbitrary limit
Anyone driving to the Midway area will find its access points from I-5 and from I-8 already choked. The ramps off those interstates are undersized. On weekend days beach ‘n breakfast goers just line up their cars and wait. People are made mad and drive desperately to overcome each other’s positions. A mature city would make a Trolley/Bus/UberLyft station there at the useless Sports Arena and its massive parking lot, coupled with affordable-only housing — but San Diego?